The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic Modulation of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ECLA Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Pilot Trial
Abstract
Background —Several trials have been performed in the past using glucose, insulin, and potassium infusion (GIK) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because of continuing uncertainty about the potential role of this therapeutic intervention, we conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the impact of a GIK solution during the first hours of AMI. Methods and Results —Four hundred seven patients with suspected AMI admitted within 24 hours of symptoms onset were enrolled. In a ratio of 2:1, 268 patients were allocated to receive GIK (high- or low-dose) and 139 to receive control. Phlebitis and serum changes in the plasma concentration of glucose or potassium were observed more often with GIK. A trend toward a nonsignificant reduction in major and minor in-hospital events was observed in patients allocated to GIK. In 252 patients (61.9%) treated with reperfusion strategies, a statistically significant reduction in mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.34; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.78; 2 P =0.008) and a consistent trend toward fewer in-hospital events in the GIK group were observed. Conclusions —Our results confirm that a metabolic modulation strategy in the first hours of an AMI is feasible, applicable worldwide, and has mild side effects. The statistically significant mortality reduction in patients who underwent a reperfusion strategy might have important implications for the management of AMI patients. It is now essential to perform a large-scale trial to reliably determine the magnitude of benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Authors/Task Force Members, Ryden, L., Standl, E., Bartnik, M., Van den Berghe, G., Betteridge, J., de Boer, M.-J., Cosentino, F., Jonsson, B., Laakso, M., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl260 · Cited by 1,647
Furnary, A. P., Gao, G., Grunkemeier, G. L., Wu, Y., Zerr, K. J., Bookin, S. O., Floten, H. S., & Starr, A. (2003) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1067/mtc.2003.181 · Cited by 1,130
Malmberg, K., Rydén, L., Wedel, H., Birkeland, K., Bootsma, A., Dickstein, K., Efendic, S., Fisher, M., Hamsten, A., Herlitz, J., et al. (2005) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi199 · Cited by 1,048
Nikolaidis, L. A., Mankad, S., Sokos, G. G., Miske, G., Shah, A., Elahi, D., & Shannon, R. P. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000120505.91348.58 · Cited by 901
Kosiborod, M., Rathore, S. S., Inzucchi, S. E., Masoudi, F. A., Wang, Y., Havranek, E. P., & Krumholz, H. M. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.517839 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Díaz, R., Paolasso, E. A., Piegas, L. S., Tajer, C. D., Moreno, M. G., Corvalán, R., Isea, J. E., Romero, G., & (Estudios Cardiológicos Latinoamérica) Collaborative Group
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-11-24
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2227-2234
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2045658220
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Modulation of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ECLA Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Pilot Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.98.21.2227
- The paper
- Díaz, R., Paolasso, E. A., Piegas, L. S., Tajer, C. D., Moreno, M. G., Corvalán, R., Isea, J. E., Romero, G., & (Estudios Cardiológicos Latinoamérica) Collaborative Group. (1998). Metabolic Modulation of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ECLA Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Pilot Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.21.2227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.