The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential Distribution of Inward Rectifier Potassium Channel Transcripts in Human Atrium Versus Ventricle
Open accessAbstract
Background —The inward rectifier K + current (I K1 ) plays an important role in governing cardiac electrical activity and is well known to have different properties in the atrium compared with the ventricle. Several inward rectifier K + channel (IRK) subunits (hIRK, HH-IRK1, HIR, and TWIK-1) with different properties have been cloned from human tissues, but their relative expression in cardiac tissues has not been quantified. The present study was designed to define the relative levels of mRNA for various IRKs in human atrium and in failing and nonfailing ventricle. Methods and Results —Competitive reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify in human atrium and ventricle the mRNA levels of hIRK, HH-IRK1, HIR, and TWIK-1. The absence of important noncardiac contamination was confirmed by demonstrating a lack of detectable mRNA markers for neuronal (acetylcholine receptor) and vascular (maxi-K channel) tissue. mRNA of HIR was more abundant in normal atrium (7.1±1.3 amol/μg total RNA) than ventricle (0.6±0.1 amol/μg, P <0.05), whereas TWIK-1 mRNA was more concentrated in ventricle (18.1±4.3 amol/μg) than atrium (1.4±0.3 amol/μg, P <0.05). Concentrations of hIRK (42.7±6.7 amol/μg in atrium vs 57.1±9.2 amol/μg in ventricle) and HH-IRK1 (2.0±0.5 amol/μg in atrium vs 1.5±0.5 amol/μg in ventricle) were comparable. No significant differences in IRK subunit transcript concentrations were found between normal and failing ventricles. Conclusions —mRNAs for all 4 IRKs are detected in human atrium and ventricle, but the mRNA copy number of a low-conductance subunit (HIR) is larger in atrium and the copy number of a weakly rectifying subunit (TWIK-1) is larger in ventricle. These differences in relative message levels may provide a potential molecular basis for different properties of I K1 in human atrium compared with ventricle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels: Their Structure, Function, and Physiological Roles
Hibino, H., Inanobe, A., Furutani, K., Murakami, S., Findlay, I., & Kurachi, Y. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2009 · Cited by 1,539
Molecular Background of Leak K+Currents: Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channels
Enyedi, P., & Czirják, G. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2009 · Cited by 868
What Causes Sudden Death in Heart Failure?
Tomaselli, G. F., & Zipes, D. P. (2004) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000145047.14691.db · Cited by 566
Dobrev, D., Graf, E., Wettwer, E., Himmel, H. M., Hála, O., Doerfel, C., Christ, T., Schüler, S., & Ravens, U. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc4601.099466 · Cited by 320
Sumoylation Silences the Plasma Membrane Leak K+ Channel K2P1
Rajan, S., Plant, L. D., Rabin, M. L., Butler, M. H., & Goldstein, S. A. N. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.019 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Yue, L., White, M., Pelletier, G., & Nattel, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2422-2428
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2055038470
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Distribution of Inward Rectifier Potassium Channel Transcripts in Human Atrium Versus Ventricle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.98.22.2422
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Yue, L., White, M., Pelletier, G., & Nattel, S. (1998). Differential Distribution of Inward Rectifier Potassium Channel Transcripts in Human Atrium Versus Ventricle. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.22.2422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.