Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mortality and Morbidity of Aortic Regurgitation in Clinical Practice: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Dujardin, Karl S., Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice, Schaff, Hartzell V., Bailey, Kent R., Seward, James B., Tajik, A. Jamil·1999·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The outcome of aortic regurgitation conservatively followed in clinical practice is poorly defined. Methods and Results —Long-term outcome of 246 patients with severe or moderately severe aortic regurgitation diagnosed by color Doppler echocardiography was analyzed. With conservative management, mortality rate was higher than expected (at 10 years, 34±5%, P <0.001) and morbidity was high (10-year rates of 47±6% for heart failure and 62±4% for aortic valve surgery). At 10 years, 75±3% of patients had died or had surgery and 83±3% had had cardiovascular events. In multivariate analysis, predictors of survival were age ( P <0.001), functional class ( P <0.001), comorbidity index ( P =0.033), atrial fibrillation ( P =0.002), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter corrected for body surface area ( P =0.025). Ejection fraction was also an independent predictor of overall survival, including postoperative follow-up of surgically treated patients ( P <0.001). High risk during conservative treatment, with mortality rate in excess of that expected, was noted among patients with severe, even transient, symptoms (24.6% yearly, P <0.001) but also in those with mild (class II) symptoms (6.3% yearly, P =0.02) and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (5.8% yearly, P =0.03) or with end-systolic diameter normalized to body surface area ≥25 mm/m 2 (7.8% yearly, P =0.004). Surgery performed during follow-up was independently associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.54; P =0.048). Conclusions —Patients diagnosed with severe aortic regurgitation in clinical practice incur excess mortality and high morbidity, underscoring the serious prognosis of the disease. Surgery, which reduces cardiac mortality rates, should be considered promptly in high-risk patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.99.14.1851

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Dujardin, K. S., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Schaff, H. V., Bailey, K. R., Seward, J. B., & Tajik, A. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1999-04-13
Volume
99
Issue
14
Pages
1851-1857
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2071477700
Cited by
499
References
0
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality and Morbidity of Aortic Regurgitation in Clinical Practice: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.99.14.1851
The paper
Dujardin, K. S., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Schaff, H. V., Bailey, K. R., Seward, J. B., & Tajik, A. J. (1999). Mortality and Morbidity of Aortic Regurgitation in Clinical Practice: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.14.1851

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.