Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Different Subsets of Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice in France: The ALFA Study

Open access
Lévy, Samuel, Maarek, Martine, Coumel, Philippe, Guize, Louis, Lekieffre, Jean, Medvedowsky, Jean-Louis, Sebaoun, Alain·1999·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The clinical presentation and causes of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the 1990s may differ from AF seen 2 to 3 decades ago. It was the objective of this prospective study to characterize various clinical presentations and underlying conditions of patients with AF observed in general practice in France. Methods and Results —The study population comprised 756 patients (19 to 95 years of age) with electrocardiographically documented AF subdivided into paroxysmal (<7 days), chronic (last episode >1 month) and recent onset AF(persistent >7 days and<1 month). Symptoms were present in 670 patients (88.6%). The relative prevalences of paroxysmal, chronic, and recent onset AF were 22.1%, 51.4%, and 26.4%, respectively. Cardiac disorders, present in 534 patients (70.6%), included hypertension (39.4%), coronary artery disease (16.6%), and myocardial diseases (15.3%) as the most common. Rheumatic valvular disease represented a common cause in women (25.0%) but not in men (8.0%). The paroxysmal group differed by a high percentage of palpitations (79.0%) and a low percentage of underlying heart disease (53.9%). With a mean follow-up of 8.6±3.7 months, 28 patients (3.7%) died, including 6 fatal cerebrovascular accidents. Among the 728 patients who survived, congestive heart failure occurred in 30 patients (4.1%), and embolic complications occurred in 13 patients (1.8%). In the paroxysmal AF group, 13 patients (8.0%) developed chronic AF and 51 (31.3%) had AF recurrences. At the time of follow-up, 53 patients (14.3%) from the chronic AF group and 108 patients (55.7%) from the recent onset AF group were in sinus rhythm. Conclusions —This large-scale study establishes the current demographic profile of out-of-hospital patients with AF and highlights some of the changes that have occurred in the past decades, including a particular shift in cardiac causes toward nonrheumatic AF. This study also demonstrates significant differences between various subsets of AF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.99.23.3028

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 579

Metadata

Authors
Lévy, S., Maarek, M., Coumel, P., Guize, L., Lekieffre, J., Medvedowsky, J.-L., & Sebaoun, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1999-06-15
Volume
99
Issue
23
Pages
3028-3035
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1988128773
Cited by
579
References
3
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Different Subsets of Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice in France: The ALFA Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.99.23.3028
The paper
Lévy, S., Maarek, M., Coumel, P., Guize, L., Lekieffre, J., Medvedowsky, J.-L., & Sebaoun, A. (1999). Characterization of Different Subsets of Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice in France: The ALFA Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.23.3028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.