The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Blood Pressure in Acute Stroke and Subsequent Outcome: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
High blood pressure (BP) is common in acute stroke and might be associated with a poor outcome, although observational studies have given varying results. In a systematic review, articles were sought that reported both admission BP and outcome (death, death or dependency, death or deterioration, stroke recurrence, and hematoma expansion) in acute stroke. Data were analyzed by the Cochrane Review Manager software and are given as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Altogether, 32 studies were identified involving 10 892 patients. When all data were included, death was significantly associated with an elevated mean arterial BP ([MABP] OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.31) and a high diastolic BP ([DBP] OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.48). Combined death or dependency was associated with high systolic BP ([SBP] OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.40) and DBP (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 1.87 to 11.70) in primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH). Similarly, high SBP (+11.73 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.30 to 22.16), MABP (+9.00 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.92 to 17.08), and DBP (+6.00 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.19 to 11.81) were associated with death or dependency in ischemic stroke. Combined death or deterioration was associated with a high SBP (OR, 5.57; 95% CI, 1.42 to 21.86) in patients with PICH. In summary, high BP in acute ischemic stroke or PICH is associated with subsequent death, death or dependency, and death or deterioration. Moderate lowering of BP might improve outcome. Acute BP lowering needs to be tested in 1 or more large, randomized trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation
Claassen, J. A. H. R., Thijssen, D. H. J., Panerai, R. B., & Faraci, F. M. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00022.2020 · Cited by 915
Sandset, E. C., Bath, P. M., Boysen, G., Jatuzis, D., Kõrv, J., Lüders, S., Murray, G. D., Richter, P. S., Roine, R. O., Terént, A., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60104-9 · Cited by 541
Self-citationComplications of intracerebral haemorrhage
Balami, J. S., & Buchan, A. M. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70264-2 · Cited by 444
Manning, L., Hirakawa, Y., Arima, H., Wang, X., Chalmers, J., Wang, J., Lindley, R., Heeley, E., Delcourt, C., Neal, B., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70018-3 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Willmot, M., Leonardi-Bee, J., & Bath, P. M. W.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-24
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2147048340
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Blood Pressure in Acute Stroke and Subsequent Outcome: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.0000105052.65787.35
- The paper
- Willmot, M., Leonardi-Bee, J., & Bath, P. M. W. (2004). High Blood Pressure in Acute Stroke and Subsequent Outcome: A Systematic Review. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000105052.65787.35
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.