The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age and gender influence muscle sympathetic nerve activity at rest in healthy humans.
Open accessAbstract
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity at rest increases with age in humans. The respective influences of the aging process per se and gender on this increase and whether age and gender effects on muscle sympathetic nerve activity can be identified with plasma norepinephrine concentrations, however, have not been established. To examine these issues, nine young women (aged 24 +/- 1 years; mean +/- SEM), eight young men (aged 26 +/- 1 years), seven older women (aged 63 +/- 1 years), and eight older men (aged 66 +/- 1 years) were studied. All were healthy, normotensive (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg), nonobese (< 20% above ideal weight), unmedicated, nonsmokers engaged in minimal to recreational levels of chronic physical activity. Arterial blood pressure (manual sphygmomanometry, brachial artery), heart rate, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (peroneal microneurography), and antecubital venous plasma norepinephrine concentrations (radioenzymatic assay) were determined during quiet supine resting conditions. Body weight was higher in men, but there were no age-related differences, whereas estimated body fat (sum of skinfolds) was higher in women and in the older groups (p < 0.05). Estimated daily energy expenditure, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were not different among the groups. Both muscle sympathetic nerve activity burst frequency and burst incidence at rest were progressively higher in the young women, young men, older women, and older men (10 +/- 1 versus 18 +/- 2 versus 25 +/- 3 versus 39 +/- 5 bursts/min and 16 +/- 1 versus 30 +/- 4 versus 40 +/- 3 versus 61 +/- 6 bursts/100 heartbeats, respectively; all p < 0.05 versus each other).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves
Vallbo, A. B., Hagbarth, K. E., Torebjork, H. E., & Wallin, B. G. (1979) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1979.59.4.919 · Cited by 1,507
Folkow, B., Di Bona, G. F., Hjemdahl, P., Torén, P. H., & Wallin, B. G. (1983) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.5.4.399 · Cited by 218
Cited by
Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses
Hunter, S. K. (2014) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12234 · Cited by 595
How to assess sympathetic activity in humans
Grassi, G., & Esler, M. (1999) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/00004872-199917060-00001 · Cited by 455
Gender-Selective Interaction Between Aging, Blood Pressure, and Sympathetic Nerve Activity
Narkiewicz, K., Phillips, B. G., Kato, M., Hering, D., Bieniaszewski, L., & Somers, V. K. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000160318.46725.46 · Cited by 398
Ho, Y.-H., del Toro, R., Rivera-Torres, J., Rak, J., Korn, C., García-García, A., Macías, D., González-Gómez, C., del Monte, A., Wittner, M., et al. (2019) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.06.007 · Cited by 315
Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Sympathetic Neural Mechanisms in Hypertension
Huggett, R. J., Scott, E. M., Gilbey, S. G., Stoker, J. B., Mackintosh, A. F., & Mary, D. A. S. G. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000103123.66264.fe · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, A. V., Callister, R., Johnson, D. G., & Seals, D. R.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 498-503
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2120786809
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.