Cited by 165Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Norepinephrine kinetics in essential hypertension. Defective neuronal uptake of norepinephrine in some patients.

Esler, M, Jackman, G, Bobik, A, Leonard, P, Kelleher, D, Skews, H, Jennings, G, Korner, P·1981·Hypertension

Abstract

To assess sympathetic nervous system function in essential hypertension, we measured the rates of release to and removal from plasma of the sympathetic neurotransmitter, norepinephrine. In normal subjects, disappearance of tritiated l-norepinephrine from plasma, after infusion to steady state, was biexponential, with t1 1/2 = 2.0 +/- 0.4 minutes (mean +/- standard deviation) and t2 1/2 = 33 +/- 15 minutes. The rapid component of removal seemed to represent neuronal uptake of norepinephrine: the t1 1/2 was lengthened by the selective inhibitor of neuronal norepinephrine uptake, desipramine; it was not changed by the extraneuronal uptake blocker, cortisol; and it was prolonged in patients with peripheral sympathetic nerve dysfunction (idiopathic autonomic insufficiency). In eight of 37 hypertensive patients, the t1 1/2 was greater than 2.8 minutes (range, 3.3-6.0 min), longer than in any normal subject; this appears to be presumptive evidence of the existence of defective neuronal norepinephrine uptake. In these patients the rate of spillover of norepinephrine to plasma, of transmitter escaping uptake after release, was 0.73 +/- 0.39 micrograms/m2/min (4.3 +/- 2.3 nmoles/m2/min), higher than in normal subjects, 0.36 +/- 0.14 micrograms/m2/min (2.1 +/- 0.8 nmoles/m2/min) (p less than 0.01). A defect in neuronal uptake of norepinephrine, by exposing adrenergic receptors to high local norepinephrine concentration, may be important in the pathogenesis of blood pressure elevation in some patients with essential hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.3.2.149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In obesity-hypertension, measures of cardiac sympathetic nerve norepinephrine reuptake were entirely normal.

    “In obesity-hypertension, these measures of cardiac sympathetic nerve norepinephrine reuptake, not shown in figure, were entirely normal.33”
  • Typical neurochemical consequences of neuronal NE reuptake impairment are facilitation of NE spillover, reduced NE plasma clearance, and altered NE metabolite pattern.

    “Typical neurochemical consequences of neuronal NE reuptake impairment are facilitation of NE spillover from sympathetic nerves to plasma, reduced clearance of NE from plasma for the body as a whole and by individual organs, and alteration in the pattern of NE metabolites due to reduction in neuronal metabolism and augmentation of extraneuronal metabolism.5,7,8,11,12,15”
  • The neurochemical indices used in this study were previously shown to be sensitive markers of reduced neuronal NE reuptake after pharmacological uptake blockade with desipramine and in patients with transporter absence accompanying pure autonomic failure.

    “The indices chosen for investigation were those previously shown to be sensitive markers of reduced neuronal NE reuptake in situations of reuptake impairment, specifically after pharmacological uptake blockade with the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine, 5,7,8 and in patients with transporter absence accompanying sympathetic nerve degeneration (pure autonomic failure).11”
  • In earlier studies, the half-time of the rapid disappearance phase of tritiated NE removal from plasma after infusion was prolonged in some patients with essential hypertension.

    “In these earlier studies, the half-time of the rapid disappearance phase of tritiated NE removal from plasma on termination of an intravenous infusion of the tracer, which is primarily, but not exclusively, dependent on neuronal NE uptake was found to be prolonged in some patients with essential hypertension.[5][6][7]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 165

Authors
Esler, M., Jackman, G., Bobik, A., Leonard, P., Kelleher, D., Skews, H., Jennings, G., & Korner, P.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1981-03
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
149-156
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2121069700
Cited by
165
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
essential hypertension, norepinephrine kinetics, sympathetic nervous system, norepinephrine spillover, desipramine, cortisol, adrenergic receptors, hypertension pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Kinetics, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Neurons, Norepinephrine, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review