The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The discontinuous nature of propagation in normal canine cardiac muscle. Evidence for recurrent discontinuities of intracellular resistance that affect the membrane currents.
Open accessAbstract
When the propagation velocity of action potentials is modified by changing the internal resistance of a cell, cable theory predicts that the shape of the action potential upstroke should not change; changes in velocity associated with changes in the upstroke usually are attributed to changes in membrane properties.However, we observed, in normal cardiac muscle, that changes in the upstroke with velocity occur under conditions in which the membrane properties could not have changed.Propagation in atrial and ventricular muscle was studied, in which the velocity of propagation was different at different angles with respect to the cell orientation.Fast upstrokes were associated with low propagation velocities (in a direction transverse to the long cell axis) and slower upstrokes were associated with high propagation velocities (in the direction of the long cell axis).Such changes in the shape of depolarization can be accounted for by the discrete cellular nature of cardiac muscle.The recurrent discontinuities in intracellular resistance cause propagation to be discontinuous on a microscopic scale.The presence of discontinuities in intracellular resistance reverses the usual association of high velocity and high safety factor for propagation: propagation at a low velocity is actually more resistant to disturbances in membrane properties than is propagation at a higher velocity.This inverted relationship suggested that propagation could continue in a direction transverse to the long axis of the cells when block occurs in the longitudinal direction, with resultant reentrant propagation.Such prediction was confirmed in the study of the propagation of premature action potentials in atrial muscle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation
Cox, J. L., Schuessler, R. B., D’Agostino, H. J., Stone, C. M., Chang, B.-C., Cain, M. E., Corr, P. B., & Boineau, J. P. (1991) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36684-x · Cited by 1,464
Basic Mechanisms of Cardiac Impulse Propagation and Associated Arrhythmias
KLÉBER, A. G., & RUDY, Y. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2003 · Cited by 1,083
Ursell, P. C., Gardner, P. I., Albala, A., Fenoglio, J. J., & Wit, A. L. (1985) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.56.3.436 · Cited by 441
Frazier, D. W., Wolf, P. D., Wharton, J. M., Tang, A. S., Smith, W. M., & Ideker, R. E. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci113945 · Cited by 386
Initiating Reentry: The Role of Nonuniform Anisotropy in Small Circuits
SPACH, M. S., & JOSEPHSON, M. E. (1994) · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.1994.tb01157.x · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Spach, M. S., Miller, W. T., Geselowitz, D. B., Barr, R. C., Kootsey, J. M., & Johnson, E. A.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1981-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-54
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2116781723
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The discontinuous nature of propagation in normal canine cardiac muscle. Evidence for recurrent discontinuities of intracellular resistance that affect the membrane currents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.48.1.39
- The paper
- Spach, M. S., Miller, W. T., Geselowitz, D. B., Barr, R. C., Kootsey, J. M., & Johnson, E. A. (1981). The discontinuous nature of propagation in normal canine cardiac muscle. Evidence for recurrent discontinuities of intracellular resistance that affect the membrane currents. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.48.1.39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.