The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in rats with healed myocardial infarction. Effects on systolic function.
Open accessAbstract
To determine the effects of healed myocardial infarction on the diastolic compliance of the left ventricle, we studied 36 rats 26 days after left coronary artery ligation. Peak cardiac output and stroke volume were measured under ether anesthesia during volume loading, and peak left ventricular developed pressure was determined during occlusion of the ascending aorta. During a slow infusion of saline into the potassium-arrested left ventricle, diastolic pressure and volume were measured continuously over the pressure range -5 to 30 mm Hg. Infarct size was determined by planimetry of serial sections taken from each heart at 1-mm intervals from apex to base. In rats with healed infarcts, left ventricular volume was increased in proportion to infarct size and the diastolic pressure-volume relationship was shifted so that at pressures below 2.5 mm Hg volume was increased, resulting in an increased ventricular compliance in this low pressure range. Above this pressure, the slopes of the pressure-volume curves were similar in rats with and without infarctions. Peak cardiac output and pressure-generating capacity were impaired in proportion to infarct size. This impairment of cardiac performance correlated with the infarct size-related increase in diastolic volume, which served to offset the reduction in flow generating capacity caused by systolic dysfunction, while contributing directly to the impairment of pressure generating capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pfeffer, M. A., Braunwald, E., Moyé, L. A., Basta, L., Brown, E. J., Cuddy, T. E., Davis, B. R., Geltman, E. M., Goldman, S., Flaker, G. C., et al. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199209033271001 · Cited by 5,911
Self-citationPfeffer, M. A., Pfeffer, J. M., Steinberg, C., & Finn, P. (1985) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.72.2.406 · Cited by 718
Self-citationAnimal Models of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Houser, S. R., Margulies, K. B., Murphy, A. M., Spinale, F. G., Francis, G. S., Prabhu, S. D., Rockman, H. A., Kass, D. A., Molkentin, J. D., Sussman, M. A., et al. (2012) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/res.0b013e3182582523 · Cited by 435
Konstam, M. A., Kronenberg, M. W., Rousseau, M. F., Udelson, J. E., Melin, J., Stewart, D., Dolan, N., Edens, T. R., Ahn, S., & Kinan, D. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2277 · Cited by 316
Peterson, J. T., Hallak, H., Johnson, L., Li, H., O’Brien, P. M., Sliskovic, D. R., Bocan, T. M. A., Coker, M. L., Etoh, T., & Spinale, F. G. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.18.2303 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Fletcher, P. J., Pfeffer, J. M., Pfeffer, M. A., & Braunwald, E.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 618-626
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W1996753402
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in rats with healed myocardial infarction. Effects on systolic function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.49.3.618
- The paper
- Fletcher, P. J., Pfeffer, J. M., Pfeffer, M. A., & Braunwald, E. (1981). Left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in rats with healed myocardial infarction. Effects on systolic function. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.49.3.618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.