The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in transient outward currents of feline endocardial and epicardial myocytes.
Open accessAbstract
Whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments were performed on enzymatically dissociated single ventricular myocytes harvested from feline endocardial and epicardial surfaces. The studies were designed to test the hypothesis that the differences in the amplitude of transient outward current (Ito) contribute to the difference in action potential configuration between endocardial and epicardial myocytes. In the control state, action potentials recorded from epicardial cells demonstrated a prominent notch between phases 1 and 2, and membrane current recordings displayed a prominent Ito, whereas in endocardial cells the notch in action potentials and Ito were small. External application of 4-aminopyridine (2 mM) reduced the amplitudes of notch and Ito in epicardial cells but not in endocardial cells. After application of 4-aminopyridine (2 mM) and caffeine (5 mM), the notch and Ito were abolished completely in both endocardial and epicardial cells. The first component of Ito (Ito1) was present in all epicardial cells studied (n = 20); it was absent in 12 of the 20 endocardial cells, and a small Ito1 was present in the remaining eight endocardial cells. The mean amplitude of Ito1 was significantly greater in epicardial than in endocardial cells. At a test voltage of +80 mV, the amplitude of Ito1 was 102.0 +/- 47.7 pA/pF in epicardial cells and 3.3 +/- 3.3 pA/pF in endocardial cells (p less than 0.01). The second component of Ito (Ito2) was present in all endocardial (n = 30) and epicardial (n = 30) cells studied. The amplitude of Ito2 was significantly greater in epicardial than in endocardial cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ter Keurs, H. E. D. J., & Boyden, P. A. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00011.2006 · Cited by 356
Early repolarization syndrome: Clinical characteristics and possible cellular and ionic mechanisms
Gussak, I., & Antzelevitch, C. (2000) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1054/jelc.2000.18106 · Cited by 347
Rosati, B., Pan, Z., Lypen, S., Wang, H., Cohen, I., Dixon, J. E., & McKinnon, D. (2001) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0119b.x · Cited by 279
Zicha, S., Xiao, L., Stafford, S., Cha, T. J., Han, W., Varro, A., & Nattel, S. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.075861 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Furukawa, T., Myerburg, R. J., Furukawa, N., Bassett, A. L., & Kimura, S.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1287-1291
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2142618720
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in transient outward currents of feline endocardial and epicardial myocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.67.5.1287
- The paper
- Furukawa, T., Myerburg, R. J., Furukawa, N., Bassett, A. L., & Kimura, S. (1990). Differences in transient outward currents of feline endocardial and epicardial myocytes. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.67.5.1287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.