Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Restenosis After Experimental Angioplasty: Intimal, Medial, and Adventitial Changes Associated With Constrictive Remodeling

Lafont, Antoine, Guzman, Luis A., Whitlow, Patrick L., Goormastic, Marlene, Cornhill, J. Fredrick, Chisolm, Guy M.·1995·Circulation Research

Abstract

Abstract Predicting and preventing arterial restenosis after angioplasty has failed despite considerable research into mechanisms and techniques. We examined the roles of chronic constriction, neointimal-medial growth, and adventitial changes in restenosis in atherosclerotic rabbits. Angioplasty was performed on femoral artery lesions 4 weeks after lesion induction by air drying and cholesterol-supplemented diet. Angiographic and histological evaluation was conducted 3 to 4 weeks after angioplasty. The angiographic minimum luminal diameter (MLD) increased from 1.31±0.21 to 1.73±0.41 mm after angioplasty. Loss in MLD by 3 to 4 weeks was 0.95±0.64 mm. Initial gain and late loss correlated ( P =.008). Late residual stenosis, defined histologically as the difference between the luminal areas of a proximal reference site and lesion site normalized by the luminal area of the reference site, was 52±32%. Histological indices of chronic constriction, neointimal-medial growth, and adventitial growth were defined on the basis of the areas of these arterial wall layers at the lesion site relative to the reference site. Another parameter defined as the ratio of adventitial area to the area of intima+media at the lesion site allowed evaluation of the relative importance of these layers. Surprisingly, late residual stenosis correlated with chronic constriction ( P =.0003) but not with neointimal-medial growth or adventitial growth. The ratio of adventitial area to the area of intima+media at the lesion site also correlated with chronic constriction ( P =.01). These findings suggest that factors related to arterial remodeling rather than neointimal-medial growth may dominate the response to angioplasty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.76.6.996

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Lafont, A., Guzman, L. A., Whitlow, P. L., Goormastic, M., Cornhill, J. F., & Chisolm, G. M.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1995-06
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
996-1002
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2023472206
Cited by
310
References
28
FWCI
36.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restenosis After Experimental Angioplasty: Intimal, Medial, and Adventitial Changes Associated With Constrictive Remodeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.76.6.996
The paper
Lafont, A., Guzman, L. A., Whitlow, P. L., Goormastic, M., Cornhill, J. F., & Chisolm, G. M. (1995). Restenosis After Experimental Angioplasty: Intimal, Medial, and Adventitial Changes Associated With Constrictive Remodeling. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.76.6.996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.