The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of Distinct Luminal Domains for Macromolecules, Erythrocytes, and Leukocytes Within Mammalian Capillaries
Abstract
A thick endothelial surface coat consisting of the glycocalyx and associated plasma proteins has been hypothesized to reduce functional capillary volume available for flowing plasma macromolecules and blood cells. The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic and functional capillary diameters available for macromolecules, RBCs, and WBCs in hamster cremaster muscle capillaries. Bright-field and fluorescence microscopy provided similar estimates (mean±SE) of the anatomic capillary diameter: 5.1±0.1 μm (bright field, 39 capillaries in 10 animals) and 5.1±0.2 μm (membrane dye PKH26, 18 capillaries in 2 animals). Estimates of functional diameters were obtained by measuring the width of RBCs and WBCs and the intracapillary distribution of systemically injected fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–dextran 70. WBCs (5.1±0.2 μm) fully occupied the anatomic capillary cross section. In contrast, the widths of RBCs (3.9±0.2 μm, 21 capillaries in 8 animals) and FITC-dextran (4.3±0.2 μm, 21 capillaries in 8 animals) were significantly smaller than the anatomic capillary diameter. Continuous (1- to 5-minute) excitation of fluorochromes in the capillary lumen (light-dye treatment) increased the width of RBCs passing the treated site from 3.6±0.3 to 4.4±0.3 μm (6 capillaries in 4 animals) and the width of the FITC-dextran column from 4.1±0.2 to 4.6±0.3 μm (10 capillaries in 7 animals). Furthermore, light-dye treatment increased capillary tube hematocrit by 60% in 40-μm-long capillary segments compared with untreated sites in the same capillaries. It is concluded that the wall of skeletal muscle capillaries is decorated with a 0.4- to 0.5-μm-thick endothelial surface coat, which may represent the true active interface between blood and the capillary wall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microvascular fluid exchange and the revised Starling principle
Levick, J. R., & Michel, C. C. (2010) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq062 · Cited by 1,183
Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells
Li, Y.-S. J., Haga, J. H., & Chien, S. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.030 · Cited by 904
Klaassen, I., Van Noorden, C. J. F., & Schlingemann, R. O. (2013) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.02.001 · Cited by 722
The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis
Uchimido, R., Schmidt, E. P., & Shapiro, N. I. (2019) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2292-6 · Cited by 710
Microvascular Rheology and Hemodynamics
LIPOWSKY, H. H. (2005) · Microcirculation · doi:10.1080/10739680590894966 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Vink, H., & Duling, B. R.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 581-589
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2156156866
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Distinct Luminal Domains for Macromolecules, Erythrocytes, and Leukocytes Within Mammalian Capillaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.79.3.581
- The paper
- Vink, H., & Duling, B. R. (1996). Identification of Distinct Luminal Domains for Macromolecules, Erythrocytes, and Leukocytes Within Mammalian Capillaries. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.79.3.581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.