Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Alterations of Na+Currents in Myocytes From Epicardial Border Zone of the Infarcted Heart: A Possible Ionic Mechanism for Reduced Excitability and Postrepolarization Refractoriness

Pu, Jielin, Boyden, Penelope A.·1997·Circulation Research

Abstract

Abstract Previously, we have shown abnormalities in V̇max and in the recovery of V̇max in myocytes dispersed from the epicardial border zone (EBZ) of the 5-day infarcted canine heart (myocytes from the EBZ [IZs]). Thus, we sought to determine the characteristics of the whole-cell Na+current (INa) in IZs and compare them with the INa of cells from noninfarcted hearts (myocytes from noninfarcted epicardium [NZs]).INa was recorded using patch-clamp techniques under conditions that eliminated contaminating currents and controlled INa for measurement (19°C, 5 mmol/L [Na+]o). Peak INa density (at −25 mV) was significantly reduced in IZs (4.9±0.44 pA/pF, n=36) versus NZs (12.8±0.55 pA/pF, n=54;P<.001), yet the half-maximal activation voltage (V 0.5), time course of decay, and time to peak INa were no different. However, in IZs, V 0.5 of the availability curve (I/Imax curve) was shifted significantly in the hyperpolarizing direction (−80.2±0.48 mV in NZs [n=45] versus −83.9±0.59 mV in IZs [n=27],P<.01). Inactivation of INa directly from a depolarized prepotential (−60 mV) was significantly accelerated in IZs versus NZs (fast and slow time constants [τ 1 and τ 2, respectively] were as follows: NZs [n=28], τ 1=71.5±5.6 ms and τ 2=243.7±17.1 ms; IZs [n=21], τ 1=36.3±2.4 ms and τ 2=153±11.3 ms;P<.001). Recovery of INa from inactivation was dependent on the holding potential (V H) in both cell types but was significantly slower in IZs. At V H=−90 mV,INa recovery had a lag in 18 (82%) of 22 IZs (with a 17.6±1.5-ms lag) versus 2 (9%) of 22 NZs (with 5.9- and 8.7-ms lags); at V H=−100 mV, τ 1=60.9±2.6 ms and τ 2=352.8±28.1 ms in NZs (n=41) versus τ 1=76.3±4.8 ms and τ 2=464.4±47.2 ms in IZs (n=26) (P<.002 and P<.03, respectively); at V H=−110 mV, τ 1=33.4±1.8 ms and τ 2=293.5±33.6 ms in NZs (n=21) versus τ 1=44.3±2.9 ms and τ 2=388.4±38 ms in IZs (n=18) (P<.002 and P<.07, respectively). In sum,INa is reduced, and its kinetics are altered in IZs. These changes may underlie the altered excitability and postrepolarization refractoriness of the ventricular fibers of the EBZ, thus contributing to reentrant arrhythmias in the infarcted heart.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.81.1.110

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Pu, J., & Boyden, P. A.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1997-07
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
110-119
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2158152768
Cited by
222
References
0
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alterations of Na+Currents in Myocytes From Epicardial Border Zone of the Infarcted Heart: A Possible Ionic Mechanism for Reduced Excitability and Postrepolarization Refractoriness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.81.1.110
The paper
Pu, J., & Boyden, P. A. (1997). Alterations of Na+Currents in Myocytes From Epicardial Border Zone of the Infarcted Heart: A Possible Ionic Mechanism for Reduced Excitability and Postrepolarization Refractoriness. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.81.1.110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.