Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 977

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in the International Stroke Trial

Open access
Leonardi-Bee, Jo, Bath, Philip M.W., Phillips, Stephen J., Sandercock, Peter A.G.·2002·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose — Among patients with acute stroke, high blood pressure is often associated with poor outcome, although the reason is unclear. We analyzed data from the International Stroke Trial (IST) to explore the relationship between systolic blood pressure (SBP), subsequent clinical events over the next 2 weeks, and functional outcome at 6 months in patients with acute stroke. Methods — We included in the analysis 17 398 patients from IST with confirmed ischemic stroke. A single measurement of SBP was made immediately before randomization. Clinical events within 14 days of randomization were recorded: recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death resulting from presumed cerebral edema, fatal coronary heart disease, and death. Survival and dependency were assessed at 6 months. Outcomes were adjusted for age, sex, clinical stroke syndrome, time to randomization, consciousness level, atrial fibrillation, and treatment allocation (aspirin, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither). Results — A U-shaped relationship was found between baseline SBP and both early death and late death or dependency: early death increased by 17.9% for every 10 mm Hg below 150 mm Hg ( P <0.0001) and by 3.8% for every 10 mm Hg above 150 mm Hg ( P =0.016). The rate of recurrent ischemic stroke within 14 days increased by 4.2% for every 10–mm Hg increase in SBP ( P =0.023); this association was present in both fatal and nonfatal recurrence. Death resulting from presumed cerebral edema was independently associated with high SBP ( P =0.004). No relationship between symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and SBP was seen. Low SBP was associated with a severe clinical stroke (total anterior circulation syndrome) and an excess of deaths from coronary heart disease ( P =0.002). Conclusions — Both high blood pressure and low blood pressure were independent prognostic factors for poor outcome, relationships that appear to be mediated in part by increased rates of early recurrence and death resulting from presumed cerebral edema in patients with high blood pressure and increased coronary heart disease events in those with low blood pressure. The occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 14 days was independent of SBP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000014509.11540.66

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 977

Metadata

Authors
Leonardi-Bee, J., Bath, P. M. W., Phillips, S. J., & Sandercock, P. A. G.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2002-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1315-1320
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1994923112
Cited by
977
References
4
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in the International Stroke Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000014509.11540.66
The paper
Leonardi-Bee, J., Bath, P. M. W., Phillips, S. J., & Sandercock, P. A. G. (2002). Blood Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000014509.11540.66

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.