The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose — Social problem-solving therapy shows promise as an intervention to improve the well-being of family caregivers. There is some evidence that training in problem solving may be effectively delivered by telephone. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of social problem-solving telephone partnerships on primary family caregiver outcomes after stroke survivors are discharged home from a rehabilitation facility. Methods — Using a randomized 3-group repeated-measures experimental design, 74 stroke survivors with an admitting diagnosis of ischemic stroke and their primary family caregivers were entered into the study. The intervention consisted of an initial 3-hour home visit between a trained nurse and the family caregiver within 1 week after discharge to begin problem-solving skill training. This initial session was followed by weekly (the first month) and biweekly (the second and third month) telephone contacts. Results — Compared with the sham intervention and control groups, family caregivers who participated in the social problem-solving telephone partnership intervention group had better problem-solving skills; greater caregiver preparedness; less depression; and significant improvement in measures of vitality, social functioning, mental health, and role limitations related to emotional problems. There were no significant differences among the groups in caregiver burden. Satisfaction with healthcare services decreased over time in the control group while remaining comparable in the intervention and sham intervention groups. Conclusion — These results indicate that problem-solving training may be useful for family caregivers of stroke survivors after discharge from rehabilitative facilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rachel Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004 · Cited by 4,458
Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale
Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6 · Cited by 2,887
Cited by
Miller, E. L., Murray, L., Richards, L., Zorowitz, R. D., Bakas, T., Clark, P., & Billinger, S. A. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e3181e7512b · Cited by 758
Problem-solving therapy for depression: A meta-analysis
Bell, A. C., & D'Zurilla, T. J. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.02.003 · Cited by 448
A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers
Chi, N.-C., & Demiris, G. (2015) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x14562734 · Cited by 409
Kwok, O.-M., Underhill, A. T., Berry, J. W., Luo, W., Elliott, T. R., & Yoon, M. (2008) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012765 · Cited by 388
Self-citationCameron, J. I., & Gignac, M. A. M. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.020 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, J. S., Elliott, T. R., Weaver, M., Bartolucci, A. A., & Giger, J. N.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2060-2065
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2103083988
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000020711.38824.e3
- The paper
- Grant, J. S., Elliott, T. R., Weaver, M., Bartolucci, A. A., & Giger, J. N. (2002). Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000020711.38824.e3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.