The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review
Abstract
Background— The precise mechanisms of and biological basis for motor recovery after stroke in adults are still largely unknown. Reorganization of the motor system after stroke as assessed by functional neuroimaging is an intriguing but challenging new field of research. Provocative but equivocal findings have been reported to date. Summary of Review— We present an overview of functional neuroimaging studies (positron emission tomography or functional MRI) of motor tasks in patients recovered or still recovering from motor deficit after stroke. After a brief account of the connectivity of motor systems and the imaging findings in normal subjects, the literature concerning stroke patients is reviewed and discussed, and a general model is proposed. Conclusions— Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the damaged adult brain is able to reorganize to compensate for motor deficits. Rather than a complete substitution of function, the main mechanism underlying recovery of motor abilities involves enhanced activity in preexisting networks, including the disconnected motor cortex in subcortical stroke and the infarct rim after cortical stroke. Involvement of nonmotor and contralesional motor areas has been consistently reported, with the emerging notion that the greater the involvement of the ipsilesional motor network, the better is the recovery. This hypothesis is supported by the enhanced activity of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex induced by motor training and acute pharmacological interventions, in parallel with improved motor function. Further longitudinal studies assessing the relationships between such changes and actual recovery, as well as manipulating such changes by rehabilitation or pharmacological maneuvers, should provide further information on these fundamental questions. This review closes with some perspectives for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits
Middleton, F. (2000) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00040-5 · Cited by 1,940
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Motor learning in man: a positron emission tomographic study
Seitz, R. J., Roland, P. E., Bohm, C., Greitz, T., & Stone-Elander, S. (1990) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199009000-00016 · Cited by 376
Cortical Language Activation in Stroke Patients Recovering From Aphasia With Functional MRI
Cao, Y., Vikingstad, E. M., George, K. P., Johnson, A. F., & Welch, K. M. A. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.11.2331 · Cited by 299
Schlaug, G., Knorr, U., & Seitz, R. (1994) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00233989 · Cited by 236
Calautti, C., Serrati, C., & Baron, J.-C. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.32.1.139 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Cited by
Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., Weiskopf, N., Blefari, M. L., Rana, M., Oblak, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.164 · Cited by 1,306
Diaschisis: past, present, future
Carrera, E., & Tononi, G. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu101 · Cited by 832
Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke?
Sharma, N., Pomeroy, V. M., & Baron, J.-C. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000226902.43357.fc · Cited by 688
Self-citationPartial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI
Marrelec, G., Krainik, A., Duffau, H., Pélégrini-Issac, M., Lehéricy, S., Doyon, J., & Benali, H. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.057 · Cited by 488
Gerloff, C., Bushara, K., Sailer, A., Wassermann, E. M., Chen, R., Matsuoka, T., Waldvogel, D., Wittenberg, G. F., Ishii, K., Cohen, L. G., et al. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh713 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Calautti, C., & Baron, J.-C.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1553-1566
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2132878222
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 39.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000071761.36075.a6
- The paper
- Calautti, C., & Baron, J.-C. (2003). Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000071761.36075.a6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.