The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable Coils
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Our aim in this study was to assess the incidence and determining factors of angiographic recurrences after endovascular treatment of aneurysms. Methods— A retrospective analysis of all patients with selective endosaccular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms prospectively collected from 1992 to 2002 was performed. There were 501 aneurysms in 466 patients (mean±SD age, 54.20±12.54 years; 74% female). Aneurysms were acutely ruptured (54.1%) or unruptured (45.9%). Mean±SD aneurysm size was 9.67±5.91 mm with a 4.31±1.97-mm neck. The most frequent sites were basilar bifurcation (27.7%) and carotid ophthalmic (18.0%) aneurysms. Recurrences were subjectively divided into minor and major (ideally necessitating re-treatment). The most significant predictors of angiographic recurrence were determined by logistic regression. These results were confirmed by χ 2 , t tests, or ANOVAs followed, when appropriate, by Tukey’s contrasts. Results— Short-term (≤1 year) follow-up angiograms were available in 353 aneurysms (70.5%) and long-term (>1 year) follow-up angiograms, in 277 (55%), for a total of 383 (76.5%) followed up. Recurrences were found in 33.6% of treated aneurysms that were followed up and that appeared at a mean±SD time of 12.31±11.33 months after treatment. Major recurrences presented in 20.7% and appeared at a mean of 16.49±15.93 months. Three patients (0.8%) bled during a mean clinical follow-up period of 31.32±24.96 months. Variables determined to be significant predictors ( P <0.05) of a recurrence included aneurysm size ≥10 mm, treatment during the acute phase of rupture, incomplete initial occlusions, and duration of follow-up. Conclusions— Long-term monitoring of patients treated by endosaccular coiling is mandatory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Campi, A., Ramzi, N., Molyneux, A. J., Summers, P. E., Kerr, R. S. C., Sneade, M., Yarnold, J. A., Rischmiller, J., & Byrne, J. V. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.106.466987 · Cited by 553
Ferns, S. P., Sprengers, M. E. S., van Rooij, W. J., Rinkel, G. J. E., van Rijn, J. C., Bipat, S., Sluzewski, M., & Majoie, C. B. L. M. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.553099 · Cited by 455
Chalouhi, N., Jabbour, P., Singhal, S., Drueding, R., Starke, R. M., Dalyai, R. T., Tjoumakaris, S., Gonzalez, L. F., Dumont, A. S., Rosenwasser, R., et al. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.000641 · Cited by 401
Endovascular Management of Intracranial Aneurysms: Current Experience and Future Advances
Koebbe, C. J., Veznedaroglu, E., Jabbour, P., & Rosenwasser, R. H. (2006) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000237512.10529.58 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Raymond, J., Guilbert, F., Weill, A., Georganos, S. A., Juravsky, L., Lambert, A., Lamoureux, J., Chagnon, M., & Roy, D.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1398-1403
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1991385448
- Cited by
- 1,496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable Coils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000073841.88563.e9
- The paper
- Raymond, J., Guilbert, F., Weill, A., Georganos, S. A., Juravsky, L., Lambert, A., Lamoureux, J., Chagnon, M., & Roy, D. (2003). Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable Coils. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000073841.88563.e9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.