The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Very Early Risk of Stroke After a First Transient Ischemic Attack
Abstract
Background and Purpose— The commonly quoted early risks of stroke after a first transient ischemic attack (TIA)—1% to 2% at 7 days and 2% to 4% at 1 month—are likely to be underestimates because of the delay before inclusion into previous studies and the exclusion of patients who had a stroke during this time. Therefore, it is uncertain how urgently TIA patients should be assessed. We used data from the Oxford Community Stroke Project (OCSP) to estimate the very early stroke risk after a TIA and investigated the potential effects of the delays before specialist assessment. Methods— All OCSP patients who had a first-ever definite TIA during the study period (n=209) were included. Three analyses were used to estimate the early stroke risk after a first TIA starting from 3 different dates: assessment by a neurologist, referral to the TIA service, and onset of first TIA. Results— The stroke risk from assessment by a neurologist was 1.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1 to 3.8] at 7 days and 4.4% (95% CI, 1.6 to 7.2) at 30 days. The 7- and 30-day stroke risks from referral were 2.4% (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.5) and 4.9% (95% CI, 1.9 to 7.8), respectively, and from onset of first-ever TIA were 8.6% (95% CI, 4.8 to 12.4) and 12.0% (95% CI, 7.6 to 16.4), respectively. Conclusions— The early risk of stroke from date of first-ever TIA is likely to be higher than commonly quoted. Public education about the symptoms of TIA is needed so that medical attention is sought more urgently and stroke prevention strategies are implemented sooner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Giles, M. F., & Rothwell, P. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70274-0 · Cited by 676
Self-citationA transient ischaemic attack clinic with round-the-clock access (SOS-TIA): feasibility and effects
Lavallée, P. C., Meseguer, E., Abboud, H., Cabrejo, L., Olivot, J.-M., Simon, O., Mazighi, M., Nifle, C., Niclot, P., Lapergue, B., et al. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70248-x · Cited by 668
A systematic review and economic evaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events
Ward, S., Lloyd Jones, M., Pandor, A., Holmes, M., Ara, R., Ryan, A., Yeo, W., & Payne, N. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11140 · Cited by 556
Kennedy, J., Hill, M. D., Ryckborst, K. J., Eliasziw, M., Demchuk, A. M., & Buchan, A. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70250-8 · Cited by 551
Brott, T. G., Halperin, J. L., Abbara, S., Bacharach, J. M., Barr, J. D., Bush, R. L., Cates, C. U., Creager, M. A., Fowler, S. B., Friday, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovett, J. K., Dennis, M. S., Sandercock, P. A. G., Bamford, J., Warlow, C. P., & Rothwell, P. M.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e138-40
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2070426582
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Very Early Risk of Stroke After a First Transient Ischemic Attack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000080935.01264.91
- The paper
- Lovett, J. K., Dennis, M. S., Sandercock, P. A. G., Bamford, J., Warlow, C. P., & Rothwell, P. M. (2003). Very Early Risk of Stroke After a First Transient Ischemic Attack. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000080935.01264.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.