Cortical Microinfarcts and Demyelination Significantly Affect Cognition in Brain Aging
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Microvascular lesions are common in brain aging, but their clinical impact is debated. Methodological problems such as the masking effect of concomitant pathologies may explain discrepancies among previous studies. To evaluate the cognitive consequences of such lesions, we prospectively investigated elderly individuals with various degrees of cognitive impairment but without significant neurofibrillary tangle pathology or macrovascular lesions. Methods— This was a clinicopathological study of 45 elderly individuals. Cognitive status was assessed prospectively with the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale; neuropathological evaluation included Aβ-protein deposition staging and bilateral semiquantitative assessment of cortical microinfarcts, focal cortical and white matter glioses, and diffuse white matter and periventricular demyelination. Results— In a univariate logistic regression model, cortical microinfarcts explained 36.1% of the variability in CDR; periventricular demyelination, 10.6%; and diffuse white matter demyelination, 4.6%. After controlling for age and Aβ-protein deposition, cortical microinfarcts were the best predictor of cognitive status (19.9% of CDR variability), whereas periventricular and diffuse white matter demyelination accounted for 9.7% and 5.4% of CDR variability, respectively. Altogether, these 3 types of microvascular lesions explained 27.9% of the clinical variability. Focal cortical and white matter glioses were not related to clinical outcome. Conclusions— Our data imply that cortical microinfarcts and both periventricular and deep white matter demyelination contribute significantly to the progression of cognitive deficits in brain aging. In contrast, the neuropathological evaluation of focal cortical and white matter gliosis has no clinical validity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The neuropathological evaluation of focal and white matter gliosis may have no clinical validity.
“Further, the neuropathological evaluation of focal and white matter gliosis may have no clinical validity [185].”
From The overlap between vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease - lessons from pathology (2014) · cites this paper as [185]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 202
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzhei- mer disease: the NUN study. JAMA. 1997;277:813-817.
- Kim KS, Miller DL, Sapienza VG, Chen CCJ, Vai C, Grundke-Iqbal I, Curry JR, Wisniewski HM. Production and characterization of mono- clonal antibodies reactive to synthetic cerebrovascular amyloid peptide. Neurosci Res Commun. 1988;2:121-130.
- de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, van Gijn J, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:145-151.
- Authors
- Kövari, E., Gold, G., Herrmann, F. R., Canuto, A., Hof, P. R., Michel, J.-P., Bouras, C., & Giannakopoulos, P.
- Affiliations
- From the Departments of Psychiatry (A.C., E.K., C.B., P.G.) and Geriatrics (G.G., F.R.H., J.-P.M.), HUG Belle-Idée, University of Geneva School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Service of Old Age Psychiatry (P.G.), University of Lausanne School of Medicine, Lausanne; and Fishberg Research Center for Neurobiology and Kastor Neurobiology of Aging Laboratories (P.R.H., C.B.) and Departments of Geriatrics and Adult Development and of Ophthalmology (P.R.H.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 410-414
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1970942691
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (AG-02219, AG 05138, P50AG005138, P01AG002219)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
- Keywords
- cortical microinfarcts, white matter demyelination, brain aging, cognitive impairment, microvascular lesions, amyloid-beta deposition, Clinical Dementia Rating, dementia progression, neuropathology
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Infarction, Cognition Disorders, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Logistic Models, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review