Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leukocyte Count as an Independent Predictor of Recurrent Ischemic Events

Grau, Armin J., Boddy, Alexander W., Dukovic, Deborah A., Buggle, Florian, Lichy, Christoph, Brandt, Tobias, Hacke, Werner·2004·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Inflammatory markers predict first-time ischemic events. We investigated whether leukocyte and differential counts predict recurrent events and ischemic events in high-risk populations, and whether such events are preceded by acutely exacerbated inflammation. Methods— We studied 18 558 patients with ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or peripheral arterial disease who participated in the trial of Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE), a study that compared the occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death under randomized treatment with aspirin or clopidogrel. Leukocyte counts were frequently assessed during followup. Results— Compared with the quartile with lowest leukocyte counts at baseline (<5.9×10 9 /L), patients in the top quartile (>8.2×10 9 /L) had higher risks for ischemic stroke (relative risk 1.30; P =0.007), myocardial infarction (relative risk 1.56, P <0.001), and vascular death (relative risk 1.51; P <0.001) after adjustment for other risk factors. Neutrophil counts contributed most to increased risk. Assessments of regression dilution effects based on replicate measurements show that these risk associations may underestimate the real associations by 30 to 50%. Treatment with aspirin or clopidogrel did not influence predictive effects by leukocytes. In the week before a recurrent event, but not at earlier time points, the leukocyte count was significantly increased over baseline levels (n=211; mean difference +0.46×10 9 /L; P =0.005). Conclusions— Leukocyte counts and mainly neutrophil counts are independently associated with ischemic events in these high-risk populations. An increase of leukocyte counts over baseline levels heralds a period of increased risk lasting about one week.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000124122.71702.64

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Grau, A. J., Boddy, A. W., Dukovic, D. A., Buggle, F., Lichy, C., Brandt, T., & Hacke, W.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2004-05
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
1147-1152
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2116907252
Cited by
308
References
5
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leukocyte Count as an Independent Predictor of Recurrent Ischemic Events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000124122.71702.64
The paper
Grau, A. J., Boddy, A. W., Dukovic, D. A., Buggle, F., Lichy, C., Brandt, T., & Hacke, W. (2004). Leukocyte Count as an Independent Predictor of Recurrent Ischemic Events. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000124122.71702.64

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.