Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Stroke in Low-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Japan Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Trial

Open access
Sato, Hiroshi, Ishikawa, Kinji, Kitabatake, Akira, Ogawa, Satoshi, Maruyama, Yukio, Yokota, Yoshiyuki, Fukuyama, Takaya, Doi, Yoshinori, Mochizuki, Seibu, Izumi, Tohru, Takekoshi, Noboru, Yoshida, Kiyoshi, Hiramori, Katsuhiko, Origasa, Hideki, Uchiyama, Shinichiro, Matsumoto, Masayasu, Yamaguchi, Takenori, Hori, Masatsugu·2006·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Although the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy for primary prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has been established, efficacy of antiplatelet therapy for low-risk patients is disputable in Japanese patients because of the frequent hemorrhagic complications. We examined the efficacy and safety of aspirin therapy in Japanese patients with NVAF in a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Methods— Patients with NVAF were randomized to an aspirin group (aspirin at 150 to 200 mg per day) or a control group without antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Primary end points included cardiovascular death, symptomatic brain infarction, or transient ischemic attack. Results— A total of 426 patients were randomized to aspirin group and 445 to no treatment. The trial was stopped earlier because there were 27 primary end point events (3.1% per year; 95% CI, 2.1% to 4.6% per year) in the aspirin group versus 23 (2.4% per year; 95% CI, 1.5% to 3.5% per year) in the control group, suggesting a low possibility of superiority of the aspirin treatment for prevention of the primary end point. In addition, treatment with aspirin caused a marginally increased risk of major bleeding (7 patients; 1.6%) compared with the control group (2 patients; 0.4%; Fisher exact test P =0.101). Conclusions— For prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF, aspirin at 150 to 200 mg per day does not seem to be either effective or safe. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the best preventive therapy for cerebrovascular events in Japanese patients with NVAF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000198839.61112.ee

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Sato, H., Ishikawa, K., Kitabatake, A., Ogawa, S., Maruyama, Y., Yokota, Y., Fukuyama, T., Doi, Y., Mochizuki, S., Izumi, T., Takekoshi, N., Yoshida, K., Hiramori, K., Origasa, H., Uchiyama, S., Matsumoto, M., Yamaguchi, T., & Hori, M.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2006-02
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
447-451
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2103245453
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Stroke in Low-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Japan Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000198839.61112.ee
The paper
Sato, H., Ishikawa, K., Kitabatake, A., Ogawa, S., Maruyama, Y., Yokota, Y., Fukuyama, T., Doi, Y., Mochizuki, S., Izumi, T., Takekoshi, N., Yoshida, K., Hiramori, K., Origasa, H., Uchiyama, S., Matsumoto, M., Yamaguchi, T., & Hori, M. (2006). Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Stroke in Low-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Japan Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000198839.61112.ee

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.