The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion–Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements
Abstract
Background and Purpose— We investigated whether computed tomography (CT) perfusion–derived cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) could be used to differentiate between penumbra and infarcted gray matter in a limited, exploratory sample of acute stroke patients. Methods— Thirty patients underwent a noncontrast CT (NCCT), CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP) scan within 7 hours of stroke onset, NCCT and CTA at 24 hours, and NCCT at 5 to 7 days. Twenty-five patients met the criteria for inclusion and were subsequently divided into 2 groups: those with recanalization at 24 hours (n=16) and those without (n=9). Penumbra was operationally defined as tissue with an admission CBF <25 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 that was not infarcted on the 5- to 7-day NCCT. Logistic regression was applied to differentiate between infarct and penumbra data points. Results— For recanalized patients, CBF was significantly lower ( P <0.05) for infarct (13.3±3.75 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 ) than penumbra (25.0±3.82 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 ). CBV in the penumbra (2.15±0.43 mL · 100 g −1 ) was significantly higher than contralateral (1.78±0.30 mL · 100 g −1 ) and infarcted tissue (1.12±0.37 mL · 100 g −1 ). Logistic regression using an interaction term (CBF×CBV) resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.0%, 97.2%, and 97.1%, respectively. The interaction term resulted in a significantly better ( P <0.05) fit than CBF or CBV alone, suggesting that the CBV threshold for infarction varies with CBF. For patients without recanalization, CBF and CBV for infarcted regions were 15.1±5.67 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 and 1.17±0.41 mL · 100 g −1 , respectively. Conclusions— We have shown in a limited sample of patients that CBF and CBV obtained from CTP can be sensitive and specific for infarction and should be investigated further in a prospective trial to assess their utility for differentiating between infarct and penumbra.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra.
Astrup, J., Siesjö, B. K., & Symon, L. (1981) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.12.6.723 · Cited by 2,820
Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia
Hossmann, K. (1994) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410360404 · Cited by 1,370
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, B. D., Fox, A. J., Lee, D. H., Sahlas, D. J., Black, S. E., Hogan, M. J., Coutts, S. B., Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Aviv, R. I., Symons, S., Gulka, I. B., Beletsky, V., Pelz, D., Hachinski, V., Chan, R., & Lee, T.-Y.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1771-1777
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2134366767
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion–Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000227243.96808.53
- The paper
- Murphy, B. D., Fox, A. J., Lee, D. H., Sahlas, D. J., Black, S. E., Hogan, M. J., Coutts, S. B., Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Aviv, R. I., Symons, S., Gulka, I. B., Beletsky, V., Pelz, D., Hachinski, V., Chan, R., & Lee, T.-Y. (2006). Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion–Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000227243.96808.53
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.