Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion–Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements

Murphy, B.D., Fox, A.J., Lee, D.H., Sahlas, D.J., Black, S.E., Hogan, M.J., Coutts, S.B., Demchuk, A.M., Goyal, M., Aviv, R.I., Symons, S., Gulka, I.B., Beletsky, V., Pelz, D., Hachinski, V., Chan, R., Lee, T.-Y.·2006·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— We investigated whether computed tomography (CT) perfusion–derived cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) could be used to differentiate between penumbra and infarcted gray matter in a limited, exploratory sample of acute stroke patients. Methods— Thirty patients underwent a noncontrast CT (NCCT), CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP) scan within 7 hours of stroke onset, NCCT and CTA at 24 hours, and NCCT at 5 to 7 days. Twenty-five patients met the criteria for inclusion and were subsequently divided into 2 groups: those with recanalization at 24 hours (n=16) and those without (n=9). Penumbra was operationally defined as tissue with an admission CBF <25 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 that was not infarcted on the 5- to 7-day NCCT. Logistic regression was applied to differentiate between infarct and penumbra data points. Results— For recanalized patients, CBF was significantly lower ( P <0.05) for infarct (13.3±3.75 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 ) than penumbra (25.0±3.82 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 ). CBV in the penumbra (2.15±0.43 mL · 100 g −1 ) was significantly higher than contralateral (1.78±0.30 mL · 100 g −1 ) and infarcted tissue (1.12±0.37 mL · 100 g −1 ). Logistic regression using an interaction term (CBF×CBV) resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.0%, 97.2%, and 97.1%, respectively. The interaction term resulted in a significantly better ( P <0.05) fit than CBF or CBV alone, suggesting that the CBV threshold for infarction varies with CBF. For patients without recanalization, CBF and CBV for infarcted regions were 15.1±5.67 mL · 100 g −1 · min −1 and 1.17±0.41 mL · 100 g −1 , respectively. Conclusions— We have shown in a limited sample of patients that CBF and CBV obtained from CTP can be sensitive and specific for infarction and should be investigated further in a prospective trial to assess their utility for differentiating between infarct and penumbra.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000227243.96808.53

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Murphy, B. D., Fox, A. J., Lee, D. H., Sahlas, D. J., Black, S. E., Hogan, M. J., Coutts, S. B., Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Aviv, R. I., Symons, S., Gulka, I. B., Beletsky, V., Pelz, D., Hachinski, V., Chan, R., & Lee, T.-Y.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2006-07
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
1771-1777
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2134366767
Cited by
294
References
3
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion–Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000227243.96808.53
The paper
Murphy, B. D., Fox, A. J., Lee, D. H., Sahlas, D. J., Black, S. E., Hogan, M. J., Coutts, S. B., Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Aviv, R. I., Symons, S., Gulka, I. B., Beletsky, V., Pelz, D., Hachinski, V., Chan, R., & Lee, T.-Y. (2006). Identification of Penumbra and Infarct in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography Perfusion–Derived Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measurements. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000227243.96808.53

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.