Cited by 201Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNerve injury and regeneration

Intracerebral Infusion of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Promotes Striatal Neurogenesis After Stroke in Adult Rats

Kobayashi, Tohru, Ahlenius, Henrik, Thored, Pär, Kobayashi, Rina, Kokaia, Zaal, Lindvall, Olle·2006·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Stroke triggers increased progenitor proliferation in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and the generation of medium spiny neurons in the damaged striatum of rodents. We explored whether intrastriatal infusion of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) promotes neurogenesis after stroke. Methods— Adult rats were subjected to 2-hour middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). GDNF was infused into the ischemic striatum either during the first week after MCAO, with the animals being killed directly thereafter, or during the third and fourth weeks, with the rats being killed 1 week later. New cells were labeled with 5′-bromo-2′deoxyuridine (BrdU) on day 7 or during the second week, respectively. Neurogenesis was assessed immunocytochemically with antibodies against BrdU and neuronal, glial, or progenitor markers. GDNF receptor expression was analyzed in SVZ tissue and neurospheres by reverse transcription—polymerase chain reaction and immunocytochemistry. Results— GDNF infusion increased cell proliferation in the ipsilateral SVZ and the recruitment of new neuroblasts into the striatum after MCAO and improved survival of new mature neurons. The GDNF receptor GFRα1 was upregulated in the SVZ 1 week after MCAO and was coexpressed with markers of dividing progenitor cells. Conclusions— Intrastriatal infusion of GDNF in the postischemic period promotes several steps of striatal neurogenesis after stroke, partly through direct action on SVZ progenitors. Because delivery of GDNF has biological effects in the human brain, our data suggest that administration of this factor may promote neuroregenerative responses in stroke patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000236025.44089.e1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GDNF has a neuroprotective role in animal models, and ICV infusion of GDNF increases progenitor cell proliferation in the DG and SVZ.

    “Experimental studies in animal models evidenced a neuroprotective role of GDNF, and ICV infusion of GDNF increased progenitor cell proliferation in the DG (Dempsey et al. 2003) and SVZ (Kobayashi et al. 2006).”

    From Neurotrophic factors and neuroplasticity pathways in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression (2018) · cites this paper as Kobayashi et al. 2006

    The Results section reports increased SVZ proliferation after intrastriatal GDNF infusion, not ICV infusion. The Discussion explicitly contrasts this with an intraventricular GDNF study that found no effect on SVZ proliferation. The dentate-gyrus finding is attributed to Dempsey et al., not to Kobayashi et al. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 201

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Brown JP, Couillard-Despres S, Cooper-Kuhn CM, Winkler J, Aigner L, Kuhn HG. Transient expression of double cortin during adult neuro- genesis. J Comp Neurol. 2003;467:1-10.

Authors
Kobayashi, T., Ahlenius, H., Thored, P., Kobayashi, R., Kokaia, Z., & Lindvall, O.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • From the Laboratory of Neurogenesis and Cell Therapy (T.K., P.T., R.K., O.L.), Section of Restorative Neurology, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, University Hospital; the Laboratory of Neural Stem Cell Biology (H.A., Z.K.), Section of Restorative Neurology, Stem Cell Institute, University Hospital; and the Lund Strategic Research Center for Stem Cell Biology and Cell Therapy (T.K., H.A., P.T., R.K., Z.K., O.L.), Lund, Sweden.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2006-09
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
2361-2367
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2116765510
Cited by
201
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Amgen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, striatal neurogenesis, middle cerebral artery occlusion, GFRα1, nerve regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cell Division, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Corpus Striatum, Injections, Male, Nerve Regeneration, Neurons, Stem Cells, Up-Regulation, Rats, Wistar, Stroke, Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Receptors, Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review