Cited by 192Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Preconditioning Reprograms the Response to Ischemic Injury and Primes the Emergence of Unique Endogenous Neuroprotective Phenotypes: A Speculative Synthesis

Stenzel-Poore, Mary P., Stevens, Susan L., King, Jeffrey S., Simon, Roger P.·2007·Stroke

Abstract

Ischemic tolerance in the brain, in which sub-threshold insults increase resistance to subsequent injurious ischemia, is a powerful adaptive defense that involves an endogenous program of neuroprotection. Emerging evidence from genomic studies suggests diverse stimuli that trigger preconditioning achieve neuroprotection through a common process which depends on a fundamental reprogramming of the response to injury. Such reprogramming of the genomic response to injury leads to the induction of novel neuroprotective pathways not ordinarily found in the setting of ischemia. Genomic studies also indicate that the nature of the preconditioning stimulus (eg, brief ischemia or endotoxin [lipopolysaccharide]) dictates the phenotype of neuroprotection, a phenotype that parallels protective adaptations also found in certain physiological conditions where the preconditioning stimulus exists at levels that can induce injury. The idea that preconditioning leads to a fundamental reprogramming event that confers neuroprotection is a novel and important concept in the field of ischemic tolerance. Moreover, the view that distinct preconditioning stimuli confer neuroprotection via effectors that differ according to the nature of the preconditioning stimulus offers promise that multiple, nonoverlapping pathways may be discovered as novel neuroprotective therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000251444.56487.4c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stenzel-Poore, M. P., Stevens, S. L., King, J. S., & Simon, R. P.
Affiliations
  • From Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology (M.P.S.-P., S.L.S.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Ore; NeuroProtect, Inc. (J.S.K.), Portland, Ore; Robert S. Dow Neurobiology Laboratories (R.P.S.), Legacy Research, Portland, Ore.
  • Legacy Health (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2007-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
680-685
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2038707186
Cited by
192
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns050567-10)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS046827, NS 35965, P01NS035965, NS50567)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
ischemic preconditioning, ischemic tolerance, neuroprotection, cerebral ischemia, endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Ischemia, Humans, Phenotype, Ischemic Preconditioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review