The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Mental practice (MP) of a particular motor skill has repeatedly been shown to activate the same musculature and neural areas as physical practice of the skill. Pilot study results suggest that a rehabilitation program incorporating MP of valued motor skills in chronic stroke patients provides sufficient repetitive practice to increase affected arm use and function. This Phase 2 study compared efficacy of a rehabilitation program incorporating MP of specific arm movements to a placebo condition using randomized controlled methods and an appropriate sample size. Method— Thirty-two chronic stroke patients (mean=3.6 years) with moderate motor deficits received 30-minute therapy sessions occurring 2 days/week for 6 weeks, and emphasizing activities of daily living. Subjects randomly assigned to the experimental condition also received 30-minute MP sessions provided directly after therapy requiring daily MP of the activities of daily living; subjects assigned to the control group received the same amount of therapist interaction as the experimental group, and a sham intervention directly after therapy, consisting of relaxation. Outcomes were evaluated by a blinded rater using the Action Research Arm test and the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Results— No pre-existing group differences were found on any demographic variable or movement scale. Subjects receiving MP showed significant reductions in affected arm impairment and significant increases in daily arm function (both at the P <0.0001 level). Only patients in the group receiving MP exhibited new ability to perform valued activities. Conclusions— The results support the efficacy of programs incorporating mental practice for rehabilitating affected arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. These changes are clinically significant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance
Fugl-Meyer, A., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197771331 · Cited by 5,564
Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity
Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/67.2.206 · Cited by 5,424
Gladstone, D. J., Danells, C. J., & Black, S. E. (2002) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/154596802401105171 · Cited by 2,032
Lyle, R. C. (1981) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001 · Cited by 1,326
Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery Following Cerebrovascular Accident
Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., & Nelson, S. G. (1983) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606 · Cited by 962
Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., Vive-Larsen, J., Støier, M., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80568-0 · Cited by 947
Platz, T., Pinkowski, C., van Wijck, F., Kim, I.-H., di Bella, P., & Johnson, G. (2005) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215505cr832oa · Cited by 894
The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery
Decety, J. (1996) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00225-1 · Cited by 792
The timing of mentally represented actions
Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80088-9 · Cited by 791
Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?
Decety, J. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00033-x · Cited by 643
Cited by
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke
Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., & van Wijck, F. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010820.pub2 · Cited by 909
Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback
Miller, K. J., Schalk, G., Fetz, E. E., den Nijs, M., Ojemann, J. G., & Rao, R. P. N. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913697107 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Page, S. J., Levine, P., & Leonard, A.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1293-1297
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2151345575
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000260205.67348.2b
- The paper
- Page, S. J., Levine, P., & Leonard, A. (2007). Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000260205.67348.2b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.