Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 778

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cerebral venous thrombosis--a review of 38 cases.

Bousser, M G, Chiras, J, Bories, J, Castaigne, P·1985·Stroke

Abstract

A series of 38 patients with angiographically proven cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) affecting dural sinuses is reported. This study shows that CVT is not rare, that the clinical diagnosis is extremely difficult because of the variable modes of onset and groupings of symptoms, that most CT findings are non specific and that angiography remains the best diagnostic tool. Only 4 patients died, which suggests a more benign outcome than classically described. None of the 23 heparin treated patients died, which indicates that anticoagulants were not harmful in this series.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.16.2.199

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 778

Metadata

Authors
Bousser, M. G., Chiras, J., Bories, J., & Castaigne, P.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1985-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
199-213
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2078016815
Cited by
778
References
0
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cerebral venous thrombosis--a review of 38 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.16.2.199
The paper
Bousser, M. G., Chiras, J., Bories, J., & Castaigne, P. (1985). Cerebral venous thrombosis--a review of 38 cases. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.16.2.199

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.