The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurologic and neuropsychological morbidity following major surgery: comparison of coronary artery bypass and peripheral vascular surgery.
Open accessAbstract
As part of a prospective study of the neurologic and neuropsychological complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 312 patients were compared with a control group of 50 patients undergoing major surgery for peripheral vascular disease. The purpose of comparing the 2 groups was to determine to what extent neurologic complications after heart surgery can be attributed to cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2 groups were similar with respect to age, preoperative neurologic and intellectual status, anesthetic methods, duration of operation, perioperative complications, and time spent in the intensive therapy unit. Certain potential risk factors for cerebrovascular disease were more common in the control than the coronary bypass patients. The important difference between the 2 groups was that only the latter group underwent cardiopulmonary bypass. In this group 191 of 312 (61%) and 235 of 298 (79%), respectively, developed early neurologic and neuropsychological complications. By the time of hospital discharge 17% had neurologic disability and 38% had significant neuropsychological symptoms. In the control group 9 of 50 (18%) developed neurologic complications resulting largely from trauma to lower limb sensory nerves. Two patients developed primitive reflexes. Fifteen of 48 (31%) showed neuropsychological impairment on 1 or 2 subtest scores. Moderate or severe intellectual dysfunction was not seen in the control patients in contrast to the 24% thus affected in the coronary bypass group. The difference in frequency and severity of central nervous system complications between the 2 groups is likely to reflect cerebral injury resulting from cardiopulmonary bypass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Newburger, J. W., Jonas, R. A., Wernovsky, G., Wypij, D., Hickey, P. R., Kuban, K., Farrell, D. M., Holmes, G. L., Helmers, S. L., Constantinou, J., et al. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199310073291501 · Cited by 702
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction after Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review
Newman, S., Stygall, J., Hirani, S., Shaefi, S., Maze, M., & Warltier, D. C. (2007) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200703000-00023 · Cited by 512
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Noncardiac Surgery
Evered, L. A., & Silbert, B. S. (2018) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000003514 · Cited by 441
Murkin, J. M., Martzke, J. S., Buchan, A. M., Bentley, C., & Wong, C. J. (1995) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(95)70230-x · Cited by 334
The robust reliability of neuropsychological measures: meta-analyses of test-retest correlations
Calamia, M., Markon, K., & Tranel, D. (2013) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.809795 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, P. J., Bates, D., Cartlidge, N. E., French, J. M., Heaviside, D., Julian, D. G., & Shaw, D. A.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 700-707
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2138566591
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurologic and neuropsychological morbidity following major surgery: comparison of coronary artery bypass and peripheral vascular surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.18.4.700
- The paper
- Shaw, P. J., Bates, D., Cartlidge, N. E., French, J. M., Heaviside, D., Julian, D. G., & Shaw, D. A. (1987). Neurologic and neuropsychological morbidity following major surgery: comparison of coronary artery bypass and peripheral vascular surgery. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.18.4.700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.