Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model.

Open access
Markus, H S, Brown, M M·1993·Stroke

Abstract

The detection of circulating particulate cerebral emboli using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography has been recently reported. It has been suggested that this method might allow discrimination between different embolic materials; this would be very useful for selecting specific pharmacological treatment in individual patients. This study was designed to identify those parameters of the Doppler signal that might prove useful in discriminating between different types and sizes of particulate cerebral emboli. An extracorporeal circuit filled with a saline/Tween solution and driven by a peristaltic pump was used. The tubing was placed in a skull in the position of the middle cerebral artery. Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, flow was insonated via the transtemporal window. The following embolic materials of measured sizes (range of maximum dimension, 0.5-5.0 mm) were introduced into the circuit: thrombus (n = 20), platelet-rich aggregates (n = 15), atheromatous material (n = 20), and fat (n = 20). The Doppler signal was recorded during the passage of each embolus. Off-line analysis was performed to measure the maximum amplitude and duration of the signal. For all embolic materials there was a highly significant relation between embolus size and maximum amplitude of the Doppler signal. The closest correlation was obtained when the logarithm of maximum amplitude was used (for thrombi, r = 0.74; for platelet, r = 0.87; for atheroma, r = 0.46; and for fat, r = 0.68). The slope of the regression line differed for the different embolic materials and was significantly steeper for platelets than for atheroma (p < 0.01). Platelet emboli of maximum dimension < or = 1.5 mm resulted in a significantly lower maximum amplitude than similarly sized atheroma emboli (157 dB versus 206.7 dB, p < 0.01). For larger emboli (> 2 mm) there was little further increase in maximum amplitude with increases in embolus size. For all embolic materials there was a highly significant linear relation between embolus size and duration of the high-amplitude (> 150 dB) signal (for thrombi, r = 0.75; for platelet, r = 0.90; for atheroma, r = 0.77; and for fat, r = 0.86). Platelet emboli result in lower-amplitude signals, and therefore analysis of maximum amplitude may provide information on the type of embolic material. However, it may be difficult to determine whether a given signal is associated with a large platelet embolus or a small atheroma embolus. Duration of the high-amplitude signal will allow accurate estimation of the size of emboli, particularly where the emboli are all of the same material.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.24.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Markus, H. S., & Brown, M. M.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1993-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2099017847
Cited by
261
References
0
FWCI
28.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.24.1.1
The paper
Markus, H. S., & Brown, M. M. (1993). Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.