The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients.
Open accessAbstract
Assessment of functional status in stroke patients is of major importance in both clinical practice and outcome studies. The Frenchay Activities Index has been developed specifically for measuring disability and handicap in stroke patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the metric properties of this instrument and to obtain normal values in a group of unselected elderly subjects. The Frenchay Activities Index was tested in a group of stroke patients and a group of unselected subjects aged 65 or older. The functional status of the stroke patients was measured 26 weeks after stroke. Their prestroke status was registered retrospectively. Reliability and validity of the instrument were assessed. The mean scores in the prestroke, poststroke, and control group demonstrated differences in functional status. The reliability of unweighted scores (range of Cronbach's alpha-coefficients, 0.78 to 0.87) was sufficient. The construct validity was supported by meaningful correlations between the Frenchay Activities Index and scores on the Barthel Index and Sickness Impact Profile. Principal-components analysis indicated that the Frenchay Activities Index showed two traits: instrumental disability and some aspects of handicap. The reliability of the instrument could be improved by deleting two items and by creating two subscale scores: domestic and outdoors activities. The Frenchay Activities Index is a useful stroke-specific instrument to assess functional status. Completion of the questionnaire is easy and takes only a few minutes. Currently, the instrument is suitable for use in patient care and cross-sectional, descriptive studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Cited by
Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial
Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Twisk, J. W., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x · Cited by 938
Stuck, A. E., Egger, M., Hammer, A., Minder, C. E., & Beck, J. C. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.8.1022 · Cited by 675
Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation
Salter, K., Jutai, J., Teasell, R., Foley, N., BItensky, J., & Bayley, M. (2005) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/0963828040008552 · Cited by 313
Measures of social outcomes in disability research
Dijkers, M. P. J. M., Whiteneck, G., & El-Jaroudi, R. (2000) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20627 · Cited by 174
Chew, J., Tay, L., Lim, J. P., Leung, B. P., Yeo, A., Yew, S., Ding, Y. Y., & Lim, W. S. (2019) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-019-1255-1 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuling, J., de Haan, R., Limburg, M., & Groenier, K. H.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1173-1177
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2053632257
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.24.8.1173
- The paper
- Schuling, J., de Haan, R., Limburg, M., & Groenier, K. H. (1993). The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.8.1173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.