The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of hospital discharge abstracts for identifying stroke.
Abstract
Much of the available data on stroke occurrence, service use, and cost of care originated with hospital discharge abstracts. This article uses the unique resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to estimate the sensitivity and positive predictive value of hospital discharge abstracts for incident stroke. The Rochester Stroke Registry was used to identify all confirmed first strokes (hospitalized and nonhospitalized) among Rochester residents for 1970, 1980, 1984, and 1989 (n = 364). The sensitivity of discharge abstracts was estimated by following these individuals for 12 months after stroke to determine the proportion assigned a discharge diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] codes 430 through 438.9). The positive predictive value of discharge abstracts was assessed by identifying all hospitalizations of Rochester residents with an ICD code of 430-438.9 in 1970, 1980, and 1989 (n = 377). Events were categorized as incident stroke, recurrent stroke, stroke sequelae, or nonstroke after review of the complete community-based medical record by a neurologist. Only 86% (n = 313) of all first-stroke patients in 1970, 1980, 1984, and 1989 were hospitalized. Of hospitalized patients, only 76% were assigned a principal discharge diagnosis code of 430-438.9. Fatal strokes and those occurring during a hospitalization were less likely to be identified. Among all hospitalizations of Rochester residents in 1970, 1980, and 1989, there were 377 with a principal diagnosis code of 430-438.9. Less than half (n = 177) were determined by the neurologist to be incident stroke; only 60% (n = 225) were either incident or recurrent stroke. Comparison of alternative approaches showed the validity of discharge abstracts was enhanced by increasing the number of diagnoses and excluding codes with poor positive predictive value. This study provides previously unavailable estimates of the sensitivity of stroke-coded hospitalizations for a US community. A model for improving the sensitivity and positive predictive value of discharge abstracts is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Validating Administrative Data in Stroke Research
Tirschwell, D. L., & Longstreth, W. T. (2002) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000032240.28636.bd · Cited by 658
National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke.
Robinson, T. (2001) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.77.906.286h · Cited by 608
Validity of diagnostic codes for acute stroke in administrative databases: a systematic review.
McCormick, N., Bhole, V., Lacaille, D., & Avina-Zubieta, J. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135834 · Cited by 414
Cardiovascular Events and Death in Children Exposed and Unexposed to ADHD Agents
Schelleman, H., Bilker, W. B., Strom, B. L., Kimmel, S. E., Newcomb, C., Guevara, J. P., Daniel, G. W., Cziraky, M. J., & Hennessy, S. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3371 · Cited by 159
Woodfield, R., Grant, I., UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group, UK Biobank Follow-Up and Outcomes Working Group, & Sudlow, C. L. M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140533 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Leibson, C. L., Naessens, J. M., Brown, R. D., & Whisnant, J. P.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2348-2355
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2026668703
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of hospital discharge abstracts for identifying stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.25.12.2348
- The paper
- Leibson, C. L., Naessens, J. M., Brown, R. D., & Whisnant, J. P. (1994). Accuracy of hospital discharge abstracts for identifying stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.12.2348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.