Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phase Relationship Between Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity and Blood Pressure: A Clinical Test of Autoregulation

Diehl, Rolf R., Linden, Dieter, Lücke, Dorothee, Berlit, Peter·1995·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose This study investigates the usefulness, as a test of dynamic autoregulation, of phase shift angle analysis between oscillations in cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and in arterial blood pressure (ABP) during deep breathing. Methods Fifty healthy volunteers, 20 patients with occlusive cerebrovascular diseases (OCD), and 10 patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVM) took part in the study. All subjects received transcranial Doppler monitoring of both middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). In addition, continuous blood pressure monitoring was performed with the use of noninvasive servo-controlled infrared finger plethysmography during deep breathing at a rate of 6/min. With the use of a high-pass filter model of autoregulation, autoregulation was quantified as phase shift angle between oscillations in CBFV and ABP at a frequency of 6/min. A phase shift angle of 0° indicates total absence of autoregulation, while 90° can be gauged as optimal autoregulation. In addition, vasomotor reactivity of both MCAs to CO 2 stimulation was assessed among patients and calculated as percent increase in CBFV per millimeter of mercury of increase in CO 2 . Results All normal subjects showed positive phase shift angles between CBFV and ABP (mean±SD, 70.5±29.8°). OCD patients presented with significantly decreased phase shift angles for the MCA only on the pathological side (51.7±35.1°; P <.05). Patients with AVM showed significantly reduced phase shift angles on both the affected side (26.8±13.5°; P <.001) and the unaffected side (40.6±26.6°; P <.01). In patients’ groups, phase shift angle and vasomotor reactivity correlated significantly ( r =.66; P <.001) after results from all MCAs were pooled. Conclusions Results confirm the high-pass filter model of cerebral autoregulation: Normal subjects showed predicted positive phase shift angles between CBFV and ABP oscillations. Patients with expected autoregulatory disturbances showed significant decreases in phase shift angles. Close correlations existed between autoregulation and CO 2 -induced vasomotor reactivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1801

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Diehl, R. R., Linden, D., Lücke, D., & Berlit, P.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1995-10
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1801-1804
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2036253606
Cited by
408
References
0
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.