The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time Course of Symptoms in Extracranial Carotid Artery Dissections: A Series of 80 Patients
Abstract
Background and Purpose Cerebral infarction is the most frequent and severe manifestation of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. However, few data exist on the precise time course of symptoms preceding the onset of stroke. Methods We studied 80 consecutive patients (29 retrospectively, 51 prospectively) with angiographically diagnosed extracranial internal carotid artery dissection and, during a 6-month follow-up, recorded the time elapsed between the onset of the first symptoms and the onset of any ischemic event (transient ischemic attack or stroke). We compared patients with and without ischemic events, with and without completed stroke, and, among patients who had local signs at onset, those with and without subsequent ischemic events. Results Cerebral or retinal infarction occurred in 42 patients. It was inaugural in 9 patients. In the 33 others, the time interval between the first symptoms (local signs and/or transient ischemic attacks) and the onset of stroke ranged from a few minutes to 31 days; it was ≤7 days in 82% of the patients. No significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the patients or in the angiographic pattern of dissection was found based on the presence or absence of ischemic signs or of completed stroke. Conclusions In carotid artery dissections, completed stroke usually occurs in the first few days after the onset of the first symptoms, whether local or ischemic, but it can occur as much as 1 month later. This suggests that any potential preventive treatment should be initiated as early as possible after the onset of the first symptoms but might also be worth initiating even 1 month later.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dissections of Cervical and Cerebral Arteries
Hart, R. G., & Easton, J. D. (1983) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8619(18)31177-0 · Cited by 443
Spontaneous Carotid Dissection With Acute Stroke
Bogousslavsky, J., Despland, P.-A., & Regli, F. (1987) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1987.00520140009010 · Cited by 316
Dissection of the intracranial vertebral artery
Caplan, L. R., Baquis, G. D., Pessin, M. S., D'Alton, J., Adelman, L. S., DeWitt, L. D., Ho, K., Izukawa, D., & Kwan, E. S. (1988) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.38.6.868 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000024 · Cited by 5,170
(2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70018-9 · Cited by 503
Cervical artery dissection?clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients
Dziewas, R., Konrad, C., Dr�ger, B., Evers, S., Besselmann, M., L�demann, P., Kuhlenb�umer, G., St�gbauer, F., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2003) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-003-0174-5 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Biousse, V., D’Anglejan-Chatillon, J., Touboul, P.-J., Amarenco, P., & Bousser, M.-G.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-239
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1968633679
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Course of Symptoms in Extracranial Carotid Artery Dissections: A Series of 80 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.26.2.235
- The paper
- Biousse, V., D’Anglejan-Chatillon, J., Touboul, P.-J., Amarenco, P., & Bousser, M.-G. (1995). Time Course of Symptoms in Extracranial Carotid Artery Dissections: A Series of 80 Patients. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.2.235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.