The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enlargement of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Incidence and Time Course
Abstract
Background and Purpose Standard radiographic criteria for hematoma enlargement have not been established. We undertook this investigation to assess the incidence and time course of hematoma growth using objective cutoff values. Methods We reviewed the clinical records of 204 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage treated nonsurgically who underwent initial computed tomography (CT) within 48 hours and repeat CT within 120 hours of the onset of symptoms. The consensus of five observers reading the CT films was considered the “gold standard” for hematoma enlargement. The discriminant values of the difference (V2−V1) or the ratio (V2/V1) of the hematoma volume on the initial (V1) and second (V2) CT scans were determined by use of receiver operating characteristic curves. We chose the cutpoint that had the highest sensitivity and specificity for identifying hematoma expansion. Results The cutpoint for hematoma enlargement was determined as V2−V1=12.5 cm 3 or V2/V1=1.4 (sensitivity=94.4%, specificity=95.8%). Forty-one patients (20%) had changes that exceeded these criteria. Frequency of hematoma expansion was greatest among those who underwent the initial CT scan early (27 [36%] of 74 patients at ≤3 hours) and progressively declined as the time to initial scan was prolonged (7 [16%] of 45 patients at 3 to 6 hours; 5 [15%] of 33 patients at 6 to 12 hours; 2 [6%] of 34 patients at 12 to 24 hours; and 0 [0%] of 18 patients at 24 to 48 hours). Conclusions The enlargement of hematoma was defined radiographically as the increase of its volume by ≥12.5 cm 3 or by ≥1.4 times. Although expansion of intracerebral hemorrhage on CT scan was common in the hyperacute stage, 17% of hematoma expansion occurred even after 6 hours of onset. Enlargement after 24 hours of onset seems extremely rare. Early CT scanning appears to increase the rate of detection of enlarging hematomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
Broderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Warfarin, hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage
Flibotte, J. J., Hagan, N., O’Donnell, J., Greenberg, S. M., & Rosand, J. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000138428.40673.83 · Cited by 632
(2006) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000094831 · Cited by 411
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Models in Rat: Comparing Collagenase to Blood Infusion
MacLellan, C. L., Silasi, G., Poon, C. C., Edmundson, C. L., Buist, R., Peeling, J., & Colbourne, F. (2008) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600548 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazui, S., Naritomi, H., Yamamoto, H., Sawada, T., & Yamaguchi, T.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1783-1787
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2039415880
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enlargement of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Incidence and Time Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.27.10.1783
- The paper
- Kazui, S., Naritomi, H., Yamamoto, H., Sawada, T., & Yamaguchi, T. (1996). Enlargement of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Incidence and Time Course. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.10.1783
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.