Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial

Carpenter, Jeffrey P., Lexa, Frank J., Davis, Julia T.·1996·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) demonstrated the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients with ≥70% carotid stenosis. Screening for detection of significant carotid occlusive disease has relied on duplex Doppler imaging. However, traditional duplex categories (50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) are not directly applicable to NASCET. We sought to evaluate duplex criteria for determination of ≥70% carotid stenosis. Methods Duplex scans and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotids), performed within 1 month of each other, were reviewed by blinded readers. Arteriographic stenosis was determined by the NASCET method. Duplex measurements of peak systolic and end-diastolic velocity (PSV, EDV) were recorded, and ratios of velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries (ICA, CCA) were calculated. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy were determined. Results Interobserver agreement for measurement of arteriographic stenosis was “almost perfect” (κ=0.86). The criteria chosen for detection of ≥70% stenosis were PSV ICA >210 cm/s (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 77%; PPV, 68%; NPV, 96%; accuracy, 83%), EDV ICA >70 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 60%; PPV, 73%; NPV, 86%; accuracy 77%), PSV ICA /PSV CCA >3.0 (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 78%; PPV, 70%; NPV, 94%; accuracy, 83%), and EDV ICA /EDV CCA >3.3 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 65%; PPV, 65%; NPV, 100%; accuracy, 79%). Conclusions We conclude that ≥70% carotid stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex Doppler ultrasound. Individual vascular laboratories must validate their own results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.27.4.695

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Carpenter, J. P., Lexa, F. J., & Davis, J. T.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1996-04
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
695-699
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2002960337
Cited by
171
References
1
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.27.4.695
The paper
Carpenter, J. P., Lexa, F. J., & Davis, J. T. (1996). Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.4.695

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.