The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial
Abstract
Background and Purpose The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) demonstrated the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients with ≥70% carotid stenosis. Screening for detection of significant carotid occlusive disease has relied on duplex Doppler imaging. However, traditional duplex categories (50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) are not directly applicable to NASCET. We sought to evaluate duplex criteria for determination of ≥70% carotid stenosis. Methods Duplex scans and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotids), performed within 1 month of each other, were reviewed by blinded readers. Arteriographic stenosis was determined by the NASCET method. Duplex measurements of peak systolic and end-diastolic velocity (PSV, EDV) were recorded, and ratios of velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries (ICA, CCA) were calculated. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy were determined. Results Interobserver agreement for measurement of arteriographic stenosis was “almost perfect” (κ=0.86). The criteria chosen for detection of ≥70% stenosis were PSV ICA >210 cm/s (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 77%; PPV, 68%; NPV, 96%; accuracy, 83%), EDV ICA >70 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 60%; PPV, 73%; NPV, 86%; accuracy 77%), PSV ICA /PSV CCA >3.0 (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 78%; PPV, 70%; NPV, 94%; accuracy, 83%), and EDV ICA /EDV CCA >3.3 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 65%; PPV, 65%; NPV, 100%; accuracy, 79%). Conclusions We conclude that ≥70% carotid stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex Doppler ultrasound. Individual vascular laboratories must validate their own results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Cited by
Grant, E. G., Benson, C. B., Moneta, G. L., Alexandrov, A. V., Baker, J. D., Bluth, E. I., Carroll, B. A., Eliasziw, M., Gocke, J., Hertzberg, B. S., et al. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2292030516 · Cited by 1,539
Allocca, M., Crosignani, A., Gritti, A., Ghilardi, G., Gobatti, D., Caruso, D., Zuin, M., Podda, M., & Battezzati, P. M. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.079814 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, J. P., Lexa, F. J., & Davis, J. T.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 695-699
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2002960337
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.27.4.695
- The paper
- Carpenter, J. P., Lexa, F. J., & Davis, J. T. (1996). Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.4.695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.