Cited by 279Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Is the EuroQol a Valid Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke?

Dorman, Paul J., Waddell, Fiona, Slattery, Jim, Dennis, Martin, Sandercock, Peter·1997·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose The EuroQol measures aspects of quality of life that are highly relevant to stroke patients. It is short and simple and many stroke patients can complete the form without help. However, its validity has not been adequately assessed after stroke. We therefore assessed its concurrent and discriminant validity in a group of prospectively studied stroke survivors. Methods We assessed the validity of the EuroQol in a series of 152 patients with stroke who were all visited by a study nurse. The nurse gave the patients the EuroQol, the Frenchay Activities Index, a visual analogue pain scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in the form of questionnaires to be self-completed where possible. The nurse interviewed the patient directly to assess disability using the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Disability scale and Barthel Index. Results The nurse assessed 152 patients; of these 92 were able to complete the EuroQol without help, the remaining 60 could only be assessed by interview. The EuroQol had reasonable concurrent validity; median scores on the relevant standard instruments varied significantly (and in the appropriate direction) for groups defined by their response to the relevant EuroQol domain. The EuroQol had reasonable discriminant validity since the responses enabled separation between patients with differing stroke syndromes and stroke severities. Accuracy for predicting outcome after stroke was good for both self-completed and interview-completed questionnaires. Conclusions The EuroQol appears to have acceptable concurrent and discriminant validity for the measurement of health-related quality of life after stroke. It may be administered by either a questionnaire for self-completion in patients with mild to moderate stroke or by interview in patients with significant motor deficits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1876

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EQ-5D-5L part two had test-retest reliability of ICC = .51 across health samples and has been validated in stroke samples.

    “Test-retest reliability was reported as ICC = .51across health samples (Janssen et al., 2008) and has been validated in stroke samples (Dorman et al., 1997;Golicki et al., 2015).”

    From Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors. (2019) · cites this paper as Dorman et al., 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorman, P. J., Waddell, F., Slattery, J., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P.
Affiliations
Western General Hospital (GB)
Venue
Stroke
Published
1997-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1876-1882
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2056244223
Cited by
279
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
EuroQol, health-related quality of life, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, stroke survivors, stroke severity, stroke syndromes, self-completion questionnaires, motor impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Health, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review