The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predisposing Factors to Enlargement of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma
Abstract
Background and Purpose Enlargement of intracerebral hemorrhage is a major cause of clinical deterioration. Identification of factors that predispose to hematoma enlargement is important in managing patients. Methods We selected 186 patients (71 women and 115 men; mean age, 64.8±12.5 years) with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage who had undergone an initial CT within 24 hours and a second scan within 120 hours of symptom onset. We compared patients with (n=41) and without (n=145) hematoma enlargement according to clinical characteristics and laboratory data. Results By multiple logistic regression analysis (n=139), interaction of long interval (>6 hours) from onset to first CT and small hematoma (<25 cm 3 ) strongly reduced risk of enlargement. The analysis also demonstrated that the following factors independently predisposed to enlargement: history of brain infarction; liver disease; interaction of fasting plasma glucose ≥141 mg/dL and systolic blood pressure on admission ≥200 mm Hg; and interaction of glycosylated hemoglobin A 1c ≥5.1% and systolic blood pressure on admission ≥200 mm Hg. Conclusions A patient examined >6 hours after ictus who has a hematoma volume <25 cm 3 is unlikely to experience further hematoma growth. Prevention of brain infarction and premorbid management of liver disease may serve to lower the risk of hematoma enlargement. Although it remains controversial whether antihypertensive drugs should be used in the acute phase of intracerebral hemorrhage, poorly controlled diabetics with high systolic blood pressure (≥200 mm Hg) on admission also were at high risk of hematoma enlargement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512
Cited by
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
Qureshi, A. I., Mendelow, A. D., & Hanley, D. F. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60371-8 · Cited by 1,526
Broderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Manning, L., Hirakawa, Y., Arima, H., Wang, X., Chalmers, J., Wang, J., Lindley, R., Heeley, E., Delcourt, C., Neal, B., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70018-3 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazui, S., Minematsu, K., Yamamoto, H., Sawada, T., & Yamaguchi, T.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2370-2375
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2063003518
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predisposing Factors to Enlargement of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.28.12.2370
- The paper
- Kazui, S., Minematsu, K., Yamamoto, H., Sawada, T., & Yamaguchi, T. (1997). Predisposing Factors to Enlargement of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.12.2370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.