The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ebselen in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —The effect of ebselen, a seleno-organic compound with antioxidant activity through a glutathione peroxidase–like action, on the outcome of acute ischemic stroke was evaluated in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Methods —Patients diagnosed as having acute ischemic stroke who could receive drug treatment within 48 hours of stroke onset were enrolled. Oral administration of ebselen granules suspended in water (150 mg BID) or placebo was started immediately after admission and was continued for 2 weeks. The major end points were the Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at 1 month and 3 months after the start of treatment. The modified Mathew Scale and modified Barthel Index scores at 1 month and 3 months were also studied as secondary outcome measures. Results —Three hundred two patients were enrolled in the trial. Intent-to-treat analysis of 300 patients (151 given ebselen and 149 given placebo) revealed that ebselen treatment achieved a significantly better outcome than placebo at 1 month ( P =.023, Wilcoxon rank sum test) but not at 3 months ( P =.056, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The improvement was significant in patients who started ebselen within 24 hours of stroke onset but not in those who started treatment after 24 hours. There was a corresponding improvement in the modified Mathew Scale and modified Barthel Index scores. Conclusions —Early treatment with ebselen improved the outcome of acute ischemic stroke. Ebselen may be a promising neuroprotective agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Cited by
Targeting oxidative stress in disease: Promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy
Forman, H. J., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00233-1 · Cited by 2,900
Organoselenium and Organotellurium Compounds: Toxicology and Pharmacology
Nogueira, C. W., Zeni, G., & Rocha, J. B. T. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0406559 · Cited by 1,926
Redox regulation of cell survival
Trachootham, D., Lu, W., Ogasawara, M. A., Valle, N. R.-D., & Huang, P. (2008) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2007.1957 · Cited by 1,781
Lubos, E., Loscalzo, J., & Handy, D. E. (2011) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3586 · Cited by 1,280
Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Stroke Trials
Sulter, G., Steen, C., & Keyser, J. D. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.8.1538 · Cited by 1,117
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamaguchi, T., Sano, K., Takakura, K., Saito, I., Shinohara, Y., Asano, T., & Yasuhara, H.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-17
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1965476204
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ebselen in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.1.12
- The paper
- Yamaguchi, T., Sano, K., Takakura, K., Saito, I., Shinohara, Y., Asano, T., & Yasuhara, H. (1998). Ebselen in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.1.12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.