Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stroke Patterns of Internal Carotid Artery Dissection in 40 Patients

Open access
Lucas, Christian, Moulin, Thierry, Deplanque, Dominique, Tatu, Laurent, Chavot, Didier·1998·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) is a frequent cause of ischemic stroke in young patients. Whether cerebral ischemia is of embolic or hemodynamic origin remains to be determined. Heparin is often administered in ICAD; however, a drug trial can hardly be conducted because of the low recurrence rate after the acute stage. Therefore, the best therapeutic approach should be determined on the basis of the presumed mechanism of cerebral ischemia. One way to approach the mechanism of stroke in ICAD is to determine stroke patterns. We postulated that most cortical and large subcortical infarcts (≥15 mm) are of embolic origin and that small subcortical infarcts (<15 mm) and junctional infarcts are not. The aim of our study was to determine the stroke patterns in 40 consecutive patients with ICAD. Methods —The patients (26 women and 14 men; mean age, 42.8 years) had a total of 65 ICADs. Seventeen patients were free of any vascular risk factor. CT scans, MRI scans, and angiographic features were analyzed by observers who were blinded to the clinical findings. Results —We found 34 cortical infarcts, 25 large subcortical infarcts, 1 small subcortical infarct, and 5 junctional infarcts. Conclusions —Most infarcts related to ICAD are cortical infarcts or large subcortical infarcts; small subcortical infarcts and junctional infarcts are infrequent. Therefore, these findings suggest that most infarcts occurring in carotid artery dissection (CAD) are probably embolic rather than hemodynamic in origin. According to this presumed mechanism, anticoagulation seems a logical treatment at the early stage of CAD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.29.12.2646

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Lucas, C., Moulin, T., Deplanque, D., Tatu, L., & Chavot, D.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1998-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
2646-2648
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2097586364
Cited by
315
References
1
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stroke Patterns of Internal Carotid Artery Dissection in 40 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.12.2646
The paper
Lucas, C., Moulin, T., Deplanque, D., Tatu, L., & Chavot, D. (1998). Stroke Patterns of Internal Carotid Artery Dissection in 40 Patients. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.12.2646

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.