The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mortality and Morbidity of Surgery for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —Greater availability and improvement of neuroradiological techniques have resulted in more frequent detection of unruptured aneurysms. Because prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage is still poor, preventive surgery is increasingly considered as a therapeutic option. Elective surgery requires reliable data on its risks. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on the mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods —Through Medline and additional searches by hand, we retrieved studies on clipping of unruptured (additional, symptomatic, or incidental) aneurysms published from 1966 through June 1996. Two authors independently extracted data. We used weighted linear regression for data analysis. Results —We included 61 studies that involved 2460 patients (57% female; mean age, 50 years) and at least 2568 unruptured aneurysms (27% >25 mm, 30% located in the posterior circulation). Mortality was 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0% to 3.3%). Permanent morbidity occurred in 10.9% (95% CI, 9.6% to 12.2%) of patients. Postoperative mortality was significantly lower in more recent years for nongiant aneurysms and aneurysms with an anterior location; the last 2 characteristics were also associated with a significantly lower morbidity. Conclusions —In studies published between 1966 and 1996 on clipping of unruptured aneurysms, mortality was 2.6% and morbidity was 10.9%. In calculating the pros and cons of preventive surgery, these proportions should be taken into account.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence
Dickersin, K. (1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100097014 · Cited by 1,417
Cited by
Thompson, B. G., Brown, R. D., Amin-Hanjani, S., Broderick, J. P., Cockroft, K. M., Connolly, E. S., Duckwiler, G. R., Harris, C. C., Howard, V. J., Johnston, S. C. (., et al. (2015) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000070 · Cited by 1,046
Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Aneurysms
Roy, D., Milot, G., & Raymond, J. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 · Cited by 961
Metadata
- Authors
- Raaymakers, T. W. M., Rinkel, G. J. E., Limburg, M., & Algra, A.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1531-1538
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2134256660
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality and Morbidity of Surgery for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.8.1531
- The paper
- Raaymakers, T. W. M., Rinkel, G. J. E., Limburg, M., & Algra, A. (1998). Mortality and Morbidity of Surgery for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.8.1531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.