Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke

Open access
van Everdingen, K.J., van der Grond, J., Kappelle, L.J., Ramos, L.M.P., Mali, W.P.T.M.·1998·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is highly sensitive in detecting early cerebral ischemic changes in acute stroke patients. In this study we compared the sensitivity of DWI with that of conventional MRI techniques. Furthermore, we investigated the prognostic value of the volume of ischemic lesions on DWI scans and of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Methods —We performed DWI, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, spin-echo T2-weighted MRI, and spin-echo proton density–weighted MRI in 42 patients with acute stroke and 15 control subjects. The volume of ischemic lesions was measured on early (<60 hours after onset) and follow-up MRI scans. Clinical outcome was measured 4 months after onset of symptoms with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, the Barthel Index, and the Rankin Scale. Results —With DWI, 98% of the ischemic lesions were detected, and with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, 91% were detected, whereas with early T2-weighted or proton density–weighted scans, only 71% ( P =0.002, χ 2 ) and 80% ( P =0.02, χ 2 ) of lesions, respectively, were found. Lesion volume on early DWI scans correlated significantly with clinical outcome ratings ( P <0.01). In patients with a first-ever stroke, a lesion volume of ≤22 mL on DWI predicted good outcome with a 75% sensitivity and a 100% specificity. The mean ADC of ischemic lesions was 29% lower than the ADC of normal-appearing parts of the brain ( P <0.001). The ADC ratio correlated significantly with clinical outcome ( P <0.05). Conclusions —DWI is a better imaging method than conventional MRI in detecting early ischemic lesions in stroke patients. Lesion size as measured on DWI scans and, to a lesser extent, ADC values are potential parameters for predicting clinical outcome in acute stroke patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.29.9.1783

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
van Everdingen, K. J., van der Grond, J., Kappelle, L. J., Ramos, L. M. P., & Mali, W. P. T. M.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1998-09
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1783-1790
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2152580513
Cited by
459
References
3
FWCI
22.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.9.1783
The paper
van Everdingen, K. J., van der Grond, J., Kappelle, L. J., Ramos, L. M. P., & Mali, W. P. T. M. (1998). Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.9.1783

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.