The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Identifies a Subset of Lacunar Infarction Associated With Embolic Source
Abstract
Background and Purpose —Small infarcts in the territory of penetrator arteries were described as causing a number of distinct clinical syndromes. The vascular pathophysiology underlying such infarcts is difficult to ascertain without careful pathological study. However, the occurrence of multiple, small infarcts, linked closely in time but dispersed widely in the brain, raises the possibility of an embolic mechanism. The current study determines the frequency and clinical characteristics of patients with well-defined lacunar syndromes and the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) evidence of multiple acute lesions. Methods —Sixty-two consecutive patients who presented to the emergency room with a clinically well-defined lacunar syndrome were studied by DWI within the first 3 days of admission. Results —DWI showed multiple regions of increased signal intensity in 10 patients (16%). A hemispheric or brain stem lesion in a penetrator territory that accounted for the clinical syndrome (“index lesion”) was found in all. DWI-hyperintense lesions other than the index lesion (“subsidiary infarctions”) were punctate and lay within leptomeningeal artery territories in the majority. As opposed to patients with a single lacunar infarction, patients with a subsidiary infarction more frequently ( P <0.05) harbored an identifiable cause of stroke. Conclusions —Almost 1 of every 6 patients presenting with a classic lacunar syndrome has multiple infarctions demonstrated on DWI. This DWI finding usually indicates an identifiable cause of stroke and therefore may influence clinical decisions regarding the extent of etiologic investigations and treatment for secondary prevention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The arterial lesions underlying lacunes
Fisher, C. M. (1969) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00685305 · Cited by 755
Capsular Infarcts: The Underlying Vascular Lesions
Fisher, C. M. (1979) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1979.00500380035003 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Cerebral microinfarcts: the invisible lesions
Smith, E. E., Schneider, J. A., Wardlaw, J. M., & Greenberg, S. M. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70307-6 · Cited by 456
Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Stroke
Nour, M., Scalzo, F., & Liebeskind, D. S. (2012) · Interventional Neurology · doi:10.1159/000353125 · Cited by 316
Retinal arterial changes correlate with cerebral small-vessel disease
Kwa, V. I. H., van der Sande, J. J., Stam, J., Tijmes, N., & Vrooland, J. L. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000033093.16450.5c · Cited by 211
Estimating cerebral microinfarct burden from autopsy samples
Westover, M. B., Bianchi, M. T., Yang, C., Schneider, J. A., & Greenberg, S. M. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31828c2f52 · Cited by 122
Potter, G., Doubal, F., Jackson, C., Sudlow, C., Dennis, M., & Wardlaw, J. (2010) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000286342 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Ay, H., Oliveira-Filho, J., Buonanno, F. S., Ezzeddine, M., Schaefer, P. W., Rordorf, G., Schwamm, L. H., Gonzalez, R. G., & Koroshetz, W. J.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2644-2650
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2014922501
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Identifies a Subset of Lacunar Infarction Associated With Embolic Source. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.30.12.2644
- The paper
- Ay, H., Oliveira-Filho, J., Buonanno, F. S., Ezzeddine, M., Schaefer, P. W., Rordorf, G., Schwamm, L. H., Gonzalez, R. G., & Koroshetz, W. J. (1999). Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Identifies a Subset of Lacunar Infarction Associated With Embolic Source. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.12.2644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.