The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of Cerebral Angiography in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Cerebral Aneurysm, and Arteriovenous Malformation: A Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —A well-defined complication rate of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation (AVM) would be useful to physicians making decisions regarding the imaging of these patients. We sought to define a statistically significant complication rate through meta-analysis of prospective studies in the literature. Methods —Meta-analysis of 3 published prospective studies of complications in cerebral angiography was performed to specifically define the risk of cerebral angiography in patients presenting with SAH, cerebral aneurysm, and AVM. The complication rates for cerebral angiography in patients with SAH and AVM/aneurysm without SAH were compared with the complication rates in patients who underwent cerebral angiography for transient ischemic attack (TIA)/ischemic stroke with use of the Fisher exact test. Results —The combined risk of permanent and transient neurological complication was significantly lower in patients with SAH compared with patients with TIA/stroke (1.8% versus 3.7%; P =0.03). The combined risk of permanent and transient neurological complication was significantly lower in patients with aneurysm/AVM without SAH compared with patients with TIA/stroke (0.3% versus 3.7%; P =0.001). When the patients with SAH and cerebral aneurysm/AVM were combined, the overall risk of permanent and transient neurological complication was significantly lower than for the TIA/stroke patients (0.8% versus 3.0%; P =0.001), as was the risk of permanent neurological complication (0.07% versus 0.7%; P =0.004). Conclusions —The risk of permanent neurological complication associated with cerebral angiography in patients with SAH, cerebral aneurysm, and AVM is quite low (0.07%). This risk is lower than previously recognized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thompson, B. G., Brown, R. D., Amin-Hanjani, S., Broderick, J. P., Cockroft, K. M., Connolly, E. S., Duckwiler, G. R., Harris, C. C., Howard, V. J., Johnston, S. C. (., et al. (2015) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000070 · Cited by 1,046
Willinsky, R. A., Taylor, S. M., terBrugge, K., Farb, R. I., Tomlinson, G., & Montanera, W. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012071 · Cited by 895
Lysakowski, C., Walder, B., Costanza, M. C., & Tramèr, M. R. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/hs1001.097108 · Cited by 414
Additional patient outcomes and pathways in evaluations of testing
Bossuyt, P. M. M., & McCaffery, K. (2009) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x09347013 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Cloft, H. J., Joseph, G. J., & Dion, J. E.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-320
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2114389781
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Cerebral Angiography in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Cerebral Aneurysm, and Arteriovenous Malformation: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.30.2.317
- The paper
- Cloft, H. J., Joseph, G. J., & Dion, J. E. (1999). Risk of Cerebral Angiography in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Cerebral Aneurysm, and Arteriovenous Malformation: A Meta-Analysis. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.2.317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.