Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validity of Self-Reported Stroke: The Tromsø Study

Open access
Engstad, Torgeir, Bønaa, Kaare H., Viitanen, Matti·2000·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —The aim of this study was to validate the diagnosis of self-reported stroke. Methods —During 1994–1995, 27 159 people attended a population health survey in the community of Tromsø, Norway, a response rate of 77%. A total of 418 attenders reported a history of stroke. In 1997, all individuals with a self-reported stroke who were still living in the community (n=362) were invited to a clinical reexamination. For each of the 269 people who were reexamined, a person who reported no history of stroke was selected and was reexamined in the same way. Results —On the basis of the reexamination, 213 (79.2%) of the self-reported strokes were confirmed. Thirteen individuals (4.8%) had a possible stroke. The remaining 43 individuals had either transient ischemic attack (TIA; n=18), traumatic head injuries (n=16), or perinatal cerebral damage, complicated migraine, syncope, possible TIA, or cerebral aneurysm without bleeding (n=9). Among the confirmed strokes, 30 (14.1%) were hemorrhagic and 118 (55.4%) were thromboembolic. Of the 30 hemorrhages, 16 were subarachnoidal bleedings, 10 due to ruptured aneurysms. The histories of stroke, including both the symptoms and the signs, often had a paucity of details and precision, making it impossible to classify 65 stroke victims (30.5%) into stroke subtypes. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a self-reported stroke was 0.79. The PPV was significantly ( P =0.016) greater in men (0.88) than in women (0.73). Individuals older than 60 years had a significantly greater PPV than those younger than 60 years (PPV 0.83 and 0.73, respectively; P =0.05). Hypertension was associated with a greater PPV, whereas a history of either ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, or depression had no impact on the PPV. The estimated sensitivity of self-reported stroke in the survey population was ≈80% and the specificity was 99%. Conclusions —We conclude that a self-administered questionnaire can be used to assess the prevalence of stroke in epidemiological research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.31.7.1602

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Engstad, T., Bønaa, K. H., & Viitanen, M.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2000-07
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1602-1607
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2163761189
Cited by
267
References
1
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.