The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delay in Presentation and Evaluation for Acute Stroke: Stroke Time Registry for Outcomes Knowledge and Epidemiology (S.T.R.O.K.E.)
Abstract
Background and Purpose —Early treatment is a critical determinant of successful intervention in acute stroke. The study was designed to find current patterns of stroke care by determining delays in time from onset of signs or symptoms to arrival at the emergency department and to initial evaluation by physicians and by identifying factors associated with these delays. Methods —Data were prospectively collected by nurses and physicians from patients, patients’ family members, and medical records from 10 hospitals of the Robert Wood Johnson Health System in New Jersey. Results —A total of 553 patients who presented with signs or symptoms of acute stroke were studied. Thirty-two percent of patients arrived at the emergency department within 1.5 hours of stroke onset. Forty-six percent of patients arrived within 3 hours and 61% within 6 hours. Delays in arrival time were significantly associated with sex, race, transportation mode, and history of cardiovascular disease. Patients arriving by ambulance were more likely to present earlier (odds ratio [OR] 3.7 for arrival within 3 hours; OR 4.5 for arrival within 6 hours). Patients arriving by ambulance (OR 2.3 within 15 minutes; OR 1.7 within 30 minutes) and those requiring admission to intensive care units (OR 4.5 within 15 minutes and OR 5.2 within 30 minutes) were examined sooner by physicians. Conclusions —Despite national efforts to promote prompt stroke evaluation and treatment, significant delays still exist. The lack of improvement throughout the past decade underscores the need for implementation of effective public health programs designed to minimize the time to evaluation and treatment of stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Cited by
Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes
Reeves, M. J., Bushnell, C. D., Howard, G., Gargano, J. W., Duncan, P. W., Lynch, G., Khatiwoda, A., & Lisabeth, L. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70193-5 · Cited by 1,362
Harbison, J., Hossain, O., Jenkinson, D., Davis, J., Louw, S. J., & Ford, G. A. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000044170.46643.5e · Cited by 537
Cruz-Flores, S., Rabinstein, A., Biller, J., Elkind, M. S. V., Griffith, P., Gorelick, P. B., Howard, G., Leira, E. C., Morgenstern, L. B., Ovbiagele, B., et al. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e3182213e24 · Cited by 507
Rodriguez, C. J., Allison, M., Daviglus, M. L., Isasi, C. R., Keller, C., Leira, E. C., Palaniappan, L., Piña, I. L., Ramirez, S. M., Rodriguez, B., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000071 · Cited by 426
Streamlining of prehospital stroke management: the golden hour
Fassbender, K., Balucani, C., Walter, S., Levine, S. R., Haass, A., & Grotta, J. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70100-5 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacy, C. R., Suh, D.-C., Bueno, M., & Kostis, J. B.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-69
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2070772868
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delay in Presentation and Evaluation for Acute Stroke: Stroke Time Registry for Outcomes Knowledge and Epidemiology (S.T.R.O.K.E.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.32.1.63
- The paper
- Lacy, C. R., Suh, D.-C., Bueno, M., & Kostis, J. B. (2001). Delay in Presentation and Evaluation for Acute Stroke: Stroke Time Registry for Outcomes Knowledge and Epidemiology (S.T.R.O.K.E.). Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.1.63
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.