The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ICH Score: A Simple, Reliable Grading Scale for Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Abstract
Background and Purpose —Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) constitutes 10% to 15% of all strokes and remains without a treatment of proven benefit. Despite several existing outcome prediction models for ICH, there is no standard clinical grading scale for ICH analogous to those for traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke. Methods —Records of all patients with acute ICH presenting to the University of California, San Francisco during 1997–1998 were reviewed. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were identified by logistic regression. A risk stratification scale (the ICH Score) was developed with weighting of independent predictors based on strength of association. Results —Factors independently associated with 30-day mortality were Glasgow Coma Scale score ( P <0.001), age ≥80 years ( P =0.001), infratentorial origin of ICH ( P =0.03), ICH volume ( P =0.047), and presence of intraventricular hemorrhage ( P =0.052). The ICH Score was the sum of individual points assigned as follows: GCS score 3 to 4 (=2 points), 5 to 12 (=1), 13 to 15 (=0); age ≥80 years yes (=1), no (=0); infratentorial origin yes (=1), no (=0); ICH volume ≥30 cm 3 (=1), <30 cm 3 (=0); and intraventricular hemorrhage yes (=1), no (=0). All 26 patients with an ICH Score of 0 survived, and all 6 patients with an ICH Score of 5 died. Thirty-day mortality increased steadily with ICH Score ( P <0.005). Conclusions —The ICH Score is a simple clinical grading scale that allows risk stratification on presentation with ICH. The use of a scale such as the ICH Score could improve standardization of clinical treatment protocols and clinical research studies in ICH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Cited by
Qureshi, A. I., Mendelow, A. D., & Hanley, D. F. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60371-8 · Cited by 1,526
Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Mayer, S. A., Brun, N. C., Begtrup, K., Broderick, J., Davis, S., Diringer, M. N., Skolnick, B. E., & Steiner, T. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707534 · Cited by 1,255
Warfarin, hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage
Flibotte, J. J., Hagan, N., O’Donnell, J., Greenberg, S. M., & Rosand, J. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000138428.40673.83 · Cited by 632
The Effect of Warfarin and Intensity of Anticoagulation on Outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Rosand, J., Eckman, M. H., Knudsen, K. A., Singer, D. E., & Greenberg, S. M. (2004) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.164.8.880 · Cited by 616
(2006) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000094831 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemphill, J. C., Bonovich, D. C., Besmertis, L., Manley, G. T., & Johnston, S. C.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 891-897
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1947113872
- Cited by
- 2,196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ICH Score: A Simple, Reliable Grading Scale for Intracerebral Hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.32.4.891
- The paper
- Hemphill, J. C., Bonovich, D. C., Besmertis, L., Manley, G. T., & Johnston, S. C. (2001). The ICH Score: A Simple, Reliable Grading Scale for Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.4.891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.