The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a new time-based method to evaluate upper extremity performance while providing insight into joint-specific and total limb movements. This study addresses selected psychometric attributes of the WMFT applied to a chronic stroke population. Methods —Nineteen individuals after stroke and with intact cognition and sitting balance were age- and sex-matched with 19 individuals without impairment. Subjects performed the WMFT and the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) on 2 occasions (12 to 16 days apart), with scoring performed independently by 2 random raters. Results —The WMFT and FMA demonstrated agreement ( P <0.0001) between raters at each session. WMFT scores for the dominant and nondominant extremities of individuals without impairment were different ( P ≤0.05) from the more and less affected extremities of subjects after stroke. The FMA score for the more affected extremity of subjects after stroke was different ( P ≤0.05) from the dominant and nondominant extremities. However, the FMA score for the less affected upper extremity of individuals after stroke was not different ( P >0.05) from the dominant and nondominant extremities of individuals without impairment. The WMFT and FMA scores were related ( P <0.02) for the more affected extremity in individuals after stroke. Conclusions —The interrater reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the WMFT, as used in these subject samples, are supported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance
Fugl-Meyer, A., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197771331 · Cited by 5,564
Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery Following Cerebrovascular Accident
Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., & Nelson, S. G. (1983) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606 · Cited by 962
WOLF, S., LECRAW, D., BARTON, L., & JANN, B. (1989) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/s0014-4886(89)80005-6 · Cited by 901
Self-citationReliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Testing Motor Performance in Patients Following Stroke
Sanford, J., Moreland, J., Swanson, L. R., Stratford, P. W., & Gowland, C. (1993) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/73.7.447 · Cited by 732
Benaim, C., Pérennou, D. A., Villy, J., Rousseaux, M., & Pelissier, J. Y. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.9.1862 · Cited by 410
Ma, D., Linder, M. T., & Sb, S. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 377
Impaired Dexterity of the Ipsilateral Hand After Stroke and the Relationship to Cognitive Deficit
Sunderland, A., Bowers, M. P., Sluman, S.-M., Wilcock, D. J., & Ardron, M. E. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.5.949 · Cited by 195
Weerdt, W. J. G. D. (1985) · Physiotherapy Canada · doi:10.3138/ptc.37.2.065 · Cited by 182
Lindmark, B., & Hamrin, E. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 144
Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke.
Wood-Dauphinée, S., Williams, J. I., & Shapiro, S. H. (1990) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.21.5.731 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154
Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke
Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., & van Wijck, F. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010820.pub2 · Cited by 909
Gauthier, L. V., Taub, E., Perkins, C., Ortmann, M., Mark, V. W., & Uswatte, G. (2008) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.502229 · Cited by 409
Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Thompson, P. A., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., Blanton, S., Nichols-Larsen, D., & Clark, P. C. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70294-6 · Cited by 331
Self-citationMaier, M., Rubio Ballester, B., Duff, A., Duarte Oller, E., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2019) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968318820169 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, S. L., Catlin, P. A., Ellis, M., Archer, A. L., Morgan, B., & Piacentino, A.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1635-1639
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2137456982
- Cited by
- 1,051
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635
- The paper
- Wolf, S. L., Catlin, P. A., Ellis, M., Archer, A. L., Morgan, B., & Piacentino, A. (2001). Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
