Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (5A Study): Six-Month Follow-Up Study

Open access
Leong-Sit, Peter, Roux, Jean-Francois, Zado, Erica, Callans, David J., Garcia, Fermin, Lin, David, Marchlinski, Francis E., Bala, Rupa, Dixit, Sanjay, Riley, Michael, Hutchinson, Mathew D., Cooper, Joshua, Russo, Andrea M., Verdino, Ralph, Gerstenfeld, Edward P.·2011·Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background—: We previously demonstrated that treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the first 6 weeks after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation reduces the incidence of clinically significant atrial arrhythmias and need for cardioversion or hospitalization for arrhythmia management. Whether early rhythm suppression decreases longer-term arrhythmia recurrence is unknown. We now report the 6-month follow-up data from this study. Methods and Results—: The Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation study prospectively randomized patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing ablation to either receive (AAD group) or not receive (no-AAD group) AAD treatment for the first 6 weeks after ablation; all patients received atrioventricular nodal blockers. Physicians were encouraged to stop the AADs after the 6-week treatment period. All patients underwent 4 weeks of transtelephonic monitoring to document asymptomatic AF and an evaluation at 6 weeks and 6 months. A total of 110 patients (71% men) aged 55±9 years were randomized, with 53 to AAD and 57 to no AAD. At 6 months, there was no difference in freedom from AF between the early AAD and no-AAD groups (38/53 [72%] versus 39/57 [68%]; P =0.84). Lack of early AF recurrence during the initial 6-week period was the only independent predictor of 6-month freedom from AF (64/76 [84%] without early recurrence versus 13/34 [38%] with early recurrence; P =0.0001). Conclusions—: Although short-term use of AADs after AF ablation decreases early recurrence of atrial arrhythmias, early use of AADs does not prevent arrhythmia recurrence at 6 months. Early AF recurrence on or off AADs during the initial 6-week blanking period is a strong independent predictor of long-term AF recurrence. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00408200.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.110.955393

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Leong-Sit, P., Roux, J.-F., Zado, E., Callans, D. J., Garcia, F., Lin, D., Marchlinski, F. E., Bala, R., Dixit, S., Riley, M., Hutchinson, M. D., Cooper, J., Russo, A. M., Verdino, R., & Gerstenfeld, E. P.
Venue
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2011-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
11-14
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2162994843
Cited by
169
References
2
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (5A Study): Six-Month Follow-Up Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.110.955393
The paper
Leong-Sit, P., Roux, J.-F., Zado, E., Callans, D. J., Garcia, F., Lin, D., Marchlinski, F. E., Bala, R., Dixit, S., Riley, M., Hutchinson, M. D., Cooper, J., Russo, A. M., Verdino, R., & Gerstenfeld, E. P. (2011). Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (5A Study): Six-Month Follow-Up Study. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.110.955393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.