Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Dabigatran for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Bassiouny, Mohamed, Saliba, Walid, Rickard, John, Shao, Mingyuan, Sey, Albert, Diab, Mariam, Martin, David O., Hussein, Ayman, Khoury, Maurice, Abi-Saleh, Bernard, Alam, Samir, Sengupta, Jay, Borek, P. Peter, Baranowski, Bryan, Niebauer, Mark, Callahan, Thomas, Varma, Niraj, Chung, Mina, Tchou, Patrick J., Kanj, Mohamed, Dresing, Thomas, Lindsay, Bruce D., Wazni, Oussama·2013·Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background—: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation is associated with a transient increased risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. We hypothesized that dabigatran can be safely used as an alternative to continuous warfarin for the periprocedural anticoagulation in PVI. Methods and Results—: A total of 999 consecutive patients undergoing PVI were included; 376 patients were on dabigatran (150 mg), and 623 patients were on warfarin with therapeutic international normalized ratio. Dabigatran was held 1 to 2 doses before PVI and restarted at the conclusion of the procedure or as soon as patients were transferred to the nursing floor. Propensity score matching was applied to generate a cohort of 344 patients in each group with balanced baseline data. Total hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were similar in both groups, before (3.2% versus 3.9%; P =0.59) and after (3.2% versus 4.1%; P =0.53) matching. Major hemorrhage occurred in 1.1% versus 1.6% ( P =0.48) before and 1.2% versus 1.5% ( P =0.74) after matching in the dabigatran versus warfarin group, respectively. A single thromboembolic event occurred in each of the dabigatran and warfarin groups. Despite higher doses of intraprocedural heparin, the mean activated clotting time was significantly lower in patients who held dabigatran for 1 or 2 doses than those on warfarin. Conclusions—: Our study found no evidence to suggest a higher risk of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications with use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing PVI compared with uninterrupted warfarin therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.113.000320

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Bassiouny, M., Saliba, W., Rickard, J., Shao, M., Sey, A., Diab, M., Martin, D. O., Hussein, A., Khoury, M., Abi-Saleh, B., Alam, S., Sengupta, J., Borek, P. P., Baranowski, B., Niebauer, M., Callahan, T., Varma, N., Chung, M., Tchou, P. J., Kanj, M., Dresing, T., Lindsay, B. D., & Wazni, O.
Venue
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2013-06
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
460-466
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2022219945
Cited by
164
References
6
FWCI
20.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Dabigatran for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.113.000320
The paper
Bassiouny, M., Saliba, W., Rickard, J., Shao, M., Sey, A., Diab, M., Martin, D. O., Hussein, A., Khoury, M., Abi-Saleh, B., Alam, S., Sengupta, J., Borek, P. P., Baranowski, B., Niebauer, M., Callahan, T., Varma, N., Chung, M., Tchou, P. J., . . . Wazni, O. (2013). Use of Dabigatran for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.113.000320

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.