Impact of Complete Versus Incomplete Circumferential Lines Around the Pulmonary Veins During Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Gap-Atrial Fibrillation–German Atrial Fibrillation Competence Network 1 Trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established treatment option for symptomatic patients. It is not known whether complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is superior to incomplete PVI with regard to the patients' clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to either incomplete (group A) or complete PVI (group B). In group A, a persistent gap was intentionally left within the circumferential ablation line, whereas in group B, complete PVI without any gaps was intended. At 3 months, all patients underwent invasive reevaluation to assess the rate of persistent PVI. Clinical follow-up was based on daily 30-s transtelephonic ECG transmissions. Primary study end point was the time to first recurrence of (symptomatic or asymptomatic) AF. A total of 233 patients were enrolled (116 in group A and 117 in group B). AF recurrence within 3 months was observed in a total of 161 patients (136 [84.5%] with symptomatic and 25 [15.5%] with asymptomatic AF); AF recurred in 62.2% of group B patients and 79.2% of group A patients (P<0.001), for a difference in favor of complete PVI of 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 5.3%-28.9%). Invasive restudy in 103 group A patients and 93 group B patients revealed conduction gaps in 92 (89.3%) and 65 (69.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study proves the superiority of complete PVI over incomplete PVI with respect to AF recurrence within 3 months. However, the rate of electric reconduction 3 months after PVI is high in patients with initially isolated PVs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00293943.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is primarily achieved through isolation of the pulmonary veins, probably requiring complete isolation for full effectiveness.
“This is primarily achieved through isolation of the pulmonary veins, probably requiring complete isolation for full effectiveness, 716”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [716]
Complete pulmonary vein isolation on an atrial level is the best documented target for catheter ablation.
“Complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on an atrial level is the best documented target for catheter ablation, 716,[729][730][731]”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [716]
Complete isolation of the pulmonary veins has better rhythm outcomes than incomplete isolation.
“Complete isolation of the pulmonary veins has better rhythm outcomes than incomplete isolation.716”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [716]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 261
- Authors
- Kuck, K.-H., Hoffmann, B. A., Ernst, S., Wegscheider, K., Treszl, A., Metzner, A., Eckardt, L., Lewalter, T., Breithardt, G., & Willems, S.
- Affiliations
- From the Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany (K.-H.K., S.E., A.M.); Department of Cardiology-Electrophysiology, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany (B.A.H., S.W.); Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (K.W., A.T.); Division of Rhythmology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany (L.E., G.B.); and Department of Cardiology, University...
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Venue
- Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e003337-e003337
- ISSN
- 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-3149
- OpenAlex
- W2242405798
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 15
- FWCI
- 32.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kompetenznetz Vorhofflimmern
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz
- St. Jude Medical
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, atrial fibrillation recurrence, conduction gaps, catheter ablation, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Conduction System, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Pulmonary Veins, Tachycardia, Paroxysmal, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review