The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving the In Silico Assessment of Proarrhythmia Risk by Combining hERG (Human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene) Channel–Drug Binding Kinetics and Multichannel Pharmacology
Open accessAbstract
Background—: The current proarrhythmia safety testing paradigm, although highly efficient in preventing new torsadogenic drugs from entering the market, has important limitations that can restrict the development and use of valuable new therapeutics. The CiPA (Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay) proposes to overcome these limitations by evaluating drug effects on multiple cardiac ion channels in vitro and using these data in a predictive in silico model of the adult human ventricular myocyte. A set of drugs with known clinical torsade de pointes risk was selected to develop and calibrate the in silico model. Methods and Results—: Manual patch-clamp data assessing drug effects on expressed cardiac ion channels were integrated into the O’Hara–Rudy myocyte model modified to include dynamic drug–hERG channel (human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene) interactions. Together with multichannel pharmacology data, this model predicts that compounds with high torsadogenic risk are more likely to be trapped within the hERG channel and show stronger reverse use dependency of action potential prolongation. Furthermore, drug-induced changes in the amount of electronic charge carried by the late sodium and L-type calcium currents was evaluated as a potential metric for assigning torsadogenic risk. Conclusions—: Modeling dynamic drug–hERG channel interactions and multi-ion channel pharmacology improves the prediction of torsadogenic risk. With further development, these methods have the potential to improve the regulatory assessment of drug safety models under the CiPA paradigm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blinova, K., Dang, Q., Millard, D., Smith, G., Pierson, J., Guo, L., Brock, M., Lu, H. R., Kraushaar, U., Zeng, H., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.079 · Cited by 373
Self-citationCardiovascular disease models: A game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening
Savoji, H., Mohammadi, M. H., Rafatian, N., Toroghi, M. K., Wang, E. Y., Zhao, Y., Korolj, A., Ahadian, S., & Radisic, M. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.036 · Cited by 223
Nguyen, N., Nguyen, W., Nguyenton, B., Ratchada, P., Page, G., Miller, P. E., Ghetti, A., & Abi-Gerges, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.01073 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Dutta, S., Sheng, J., Tran, P. N., Wu, W., Chang, K., Mdluli, T., Strauss, D. G., & Colatsky, T.
- Venue
- Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e004628-e004628
- ISSN
- 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-3149
- OpenAlex
- W2588081908
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the In Silico Assessment of Proarrhythmia Risk by Combining hERG (Human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene) Channel–Drug Binding Kinetics and Multichannel Pharmacology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.116.004628
- The paper
- Li, Z., Dutta, S., Sheng, J., Tran, P. N., Wu, W., Chang, K., Mdluli, T., Strauss, D. G., & Colatsky, T. (2017). Improving the In Silico Assessment of Proarrhythmia Risk by Combining hERG (Human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene) Channel–Drug Binding Kinetics and Multichannel Pharmacology. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.116.004628
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.